Kathleen Cane Pa state attorney general
some say Ms. Kane who was the first female Attorney Genera of PA.
career destroyed by the Judicial powers that be in Pennsylvania because of her views on Racism. Following are some excerpts from articles in Bing Search and Wikipedia
ROOTS OF RACISM IN PHILADELPHIA AND HARRISBURG WHERE HARTMAN ALLEGES SHE WAS DEFAMED AND DEFRAUDED
Ms. Kane's Early Life and Education
Kane was born Kathleen Margaret Granahan and grew up on the west side of Scranton , Pennsylvania, where she Kane received a Bachelor of Science degree in International Studies from the University of Scranton in 1988 and JD from Temple University Law School in 1993
She began her Law career
Kane was an attorney at Post & Schell P.C., a Philadelphia law firm, prior to 1995 and handled civil cases From 1995 to 2007, she served as an assistant district attorney for Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania, where she prosecuted hundreds of sex-abuse, elder abuse, murder, assault, rape, public corruption, and fraud cases.In 2007, Kane worked for a private law firm in Scranton, Pennsylvania,
Some believe that her career was destroyed because of her liberal views on RACISM
On March 17, 2014, Kane announced that she had shut down a corruption investigation begun under her predecessor, saying that "the undercover investigation was poorly managed and badly executed, and relied on an undercover operative whose credibility had been compromised."Kane also asserted she had documentation to support her assertion that racism marred the sting.The investigation was following up on reports of corruption among current Philadelphia politicians, all of the suspects belonged to the Democratic Party. In response, the called on the state legislature to designate an independent counsel to investigate the closing of the case.Local prosecutors in Philadelphia picked up the case, and secured a number of guilty pleas as well as grand jury indictments.
A Democrat herself , many believe that her politics and liberal views on Racism brought her downfall
2012 election
Main article: 2012 Pennsylvania Attorney General election
Kane announced her candidacy for Pennsylvania Attorney General in the 2012 election. She received endorsements from U.S. President Bill Clinton and The Philadelphia Inquirer during the Democratic primary.[18][19] Her primary opponent, former U.S. Representative Patrick Murphy, was endorsed by former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.[19] Kane defeated Murphy 53% to 47%.[5] In the general election, Kane won by 14.5 percent over Cumberland County District Attorney David Freed[20] who ran unopposed in the Republican primary.[16] The win made Kane the first woman elected State Attorney General in Pennsylvania,[Note 1] and the first Democrat elected to the position since it ceased being an appointed office in 1980.[4] Kane received more votes than President Obama or Senator Casey did in Pennsylvania during the 2012 elections; her total number of votes was then the fourth highest of any politician in Pennsylvania electoral history.[21]
Patent application #11003123
Was it prosecuted lawfully ?
Above are some of the real ROOTS of how activist Judges and State Officers in Pennsylvania began onslaught of DEFAMATION , FRAUD, AND ILLEGAL TAKEAWAY OF HARTMAN'S PERSONAL PROPERTY .The case In Re Dorothy M. Hartman referencing the Patent Office was decided by FRAUD and was incorrectly decided . The wrong set of claims were used to decide the case . Here you will find the claims that were used to decide the case but remember they were unedited . Hartman was forced to rewrite claims according to 2011 law although she had filed in 2004 . The rewritten claims are found here on the website but were deliberately not used in the Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit to insure denial of the Patent as Hartman alleges .
Concepts were introduced to SBIR in 1990
Hartman filed concepts from the Accessibility Process and Submitted concepts in 1990 to federal government's Research and Innovation Program SBIR .Patent Application filed Dec. 3 2004 after government had taken possession of the process and used it to replace its failed Arpanet and now refuses to recognize or compensate her .
Fed. Gov . had control of Accessing Accessibility from 1990- pres.
Hartman alleges that the U.S. Federal Government has had control of her intellectual property from 1990 until now claiming the Internet 2 as its own . Wny was her patent application denied ?
Who are the supposed inventor(s) who barred the patent ?
Is the Circuit Ct. of Appeals , Case No. 2013-1070 Opinion of "Indefiniteness" a true reason to deny patenting or the government's illegal seizure of inventor's intellectual property ? The inventor has been subjected to defamation , illegal confiscation of her home , bodily harm , blackballing in legal databases to frighten of lawyers , now censuring from her own invention
Hartman alleges a 30 year violation of her constitutional and civil rights as well as allegations of slavery and deprivation of her property rights, intimidation and threats , censure , illegal trials , and other forms of persecution .
Government presents Tim Berners Lee and others as Inventors of the Internet and Worldwide Web
Hartman alleges that it was her invention that brought the modern day internet into existence and others have been important contributor to the cogs that make the Internet run, Mr. Lee is not its inventor but he designed the first website that moves your browser from one website address to another in Cyberspace.
