How do Courts support certain companies as the Internet?
Did the Courts favor companies that depend on Hartman's Invention or Internet 2 ?
let's talk about patentable and patent law.Hartman’s invention , the Accessing Accessibility Process , Patent Application #11003123 is based on her abstract thoughts , but she placed those thoughts into steps that she allege were stolen by the National Science Foundation in 1990-1991 and then commissioned Merit Networks , IBM, MCI mail and others to apply those ideas to the skeletal network(s) of the government’s or Darpa’s original Internet begun in 1969. I will examine in further writings why the government is wrong in assuming intellectual property by Ms. Hartman without applying proper law .
How come Big Tech companies are classified as the Internet and patented but the INTERNET is not ?
Citing 54.16.330 Universal Citation ?
A public utility district shall not exercise powers of eminent domain to acquire telecommunications facilities or contractual rights held by any other person or entity to telecommunications facilities.
Did Congress change telecom rules and commerce after 1990 ?
Complete overhaul of rules of Commerce and Telecommunication after 1990. Was Ms. Hartman's invention Accessing Accessibility left out while code writers were credited with the invention or did the government assign the invention to itself? Universal Citation : 54.16.330
Hartman used Abstract thoughts to conceive what has a structural and useful outcome.
“The Examiner bears the initial burden … of presenting a prima-facie case of unpatentability ” InreOetiker 977F.2d 1443,1445.24 USPQ2d 1443 ,1444(Fed Cir.1992 ). If the record as a whole suggests that it is more likely than not that the claimed invention would be considered a practical application of an abstract idea , … natural phenomenon , or law of nature, the examiner should not reject the claim.
The abstract thoughts led to a novel structure with practical applications and is therefore patentable.
Was there Collusion amongst branches of Government to violate the constitution for profit ?
The Inventor alleges "yes" for the tool or weapon that it has become and the passage to wealth for many , including those of foreign nations . These blatant violations that have exploited the minority inventor are totally unacceptable. The Inventor has a right to Retribution and to be made whole for the blatant use of Eminent Domain without declaration . Using her personal property to redistribute wealth to itself and those whom it desires to profiteer.
Government took the invention - too great for the inventor?
shipped to foreign govs.
Ms. Hartman did not give her permission for the government to use her property without asking her permission especially after the Clinton nor Obama administrations declared Eminent Domain violating Ms. Hartman's 5th Amendment rights . Everyone makes a big issue of racial identity politics . This is all this is . My case is thoroughly documented and should be tried by law . But thus far nothing but propaganda and racial politics. LAW DOES NOT MATTER BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF MY SKIN . NOT ONE OF MY DESIGNS NOT THE INTERNET OR ACCESSING ACCESSIBILITY PROCESS , OR INFANT SAFETY PRODUCTS HAS ANY CODED OR DEVISIVE WORDS SAYING ONE PART OF THE DESIGN IS FOR ONE SKIN COLOR AND ANOTHER PART OF THE DESIGN FOR ANOTHER SKIN COLOR . IT AS DESIGNED FOR PEOPLE . PERIOD. YET EVERYTHING SITTING UP ON THE INTERNET AND USING IT EVERYDAY AND KNOWS ABOUT THIS LACKS THE INTEGRITY TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT . THEY CANNOT GET PAST MY BLACK SKIN .
I did not do a global reset , the U.S. government did using my intellectual property as its own and giving it away "royalty free" to Big Tech and Ecommerce who have made a mint of it while the government monsters tore my life apart with defamation , loss and theft of my homes and other financial assets . When the government by passed my constitutional rights they also bypassed the rights of other citizens and they are just waking up slowly to the reality of the entire ugly business. They should insist on lawful treatment of my case . It would help the entire nation. But they are so handicapped by racial prejudice . Yes , I am angry but I will continue to pursue the Justice that I deserve .
create trade
I NEED LAWYERS WITH INTEGRITY AND GUTS ENOUGH TO REPRESENT ME OR AT LEAST HAVE COURAGE TO FIGHT ALONG WITH ME FOR JUSTICE . THE MODERN DAY INTERNET HAS BOTH EMPOWERED AND ENRICHED THE GOVERNMENT ALTHOUGH BY LAW THEY DO NOT LEGALLY OWN IT AND ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS. BUT THE BIGOTS WOULD RATHER GO DOWN AMIDST INFLATION , CHAOS , AND WHO KNOWS WHERE THE INSANITY LEADS .? YES , WITHOUT A DOUBT I REGRET SHARING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WITH A RACIST AND GREEDY GOVERNMENT THAT APPEARS TO HAVE LOST ITS ETHICAL AND MORAL COMPASS. - completely denied and demolished as long as both the Right and Left have their space on the Internet for their now social media , podcasts , etc.Those of you concerned about the direction this country is headed in , speak up and let your voices be heard . Insist that the classified documents regarding the U.K., Mexico, China ,Canada, Israel , and the nature of that intellectual property transfer be known. This classified documents business is about more than Hunter Biden's Laptop. It is also about trying to continue to use the Hartman's Accessing Accessibility WITH THE FRAUD SHOWING RIGHT HERE ON THIS WEBSITE IN PLAIN SIGHT- excuse the vernacular 'without paying the nigger that much money'
inventor to file writ of certiorari to supreme court.....
USPTO shows inventor's name and intellectual property used to set up global internet but Courts deny
USPTO shows inventor's name and intellectual property used to set up global internet but Courts deny
USPTO shows inventor's name and intellectual property used to set up global internet but Courts deny
Hartman says federal government has complete control of internet and invention and will seek Justice
USPTO shows inventor's name and intellectual property used to set up global internet but Courts deny
USPTO shows inventor's name and intellectual property used to set up global internet but Courts deny
Patenting an African-American would better than Theft....
Accessing Accessibility Process used to build the Internet
I lived and felt like a human being before sharing my intellectual property with what I can only characterize as "scum". Not only are they ruining me but the entire nation . I want this case made PUBLIC. My invention should have been patented and then Eminent Domain declared right here in this nation.