Go directly to Pacer.gov and look up the following case Hartman vs. United States Court of Federal Claims Case no.21-2214
Inventor Does Not Seek to Run the World -She Wants JUSTICE!
Case. 21-2214 in Court of federal claims
Though it is still early in the trial and the case has a new judge , thus far the atmosphere of deception and fraud seems to be continuing and this is because of the secretive nature of the trial .
Many people do not understand the nature of the trial . This inventor does not build phones or computers what this argument is about is this inventor supplied the ideas for the new Internet that debuted in the 1990's and the government has tried to propagate the fraudulent idea that the new internet was just a continuation of its own internet started in 1969. THAT IS SIMPLY NOT TRUE AND AS A POPULATION , the people of the United States you have a right to know the truth and I have a right to Justice . .
More Press Releases
Where is a legal trial on this matter ?
Since coming into contact with these people and since 1990 with the theft of my intellectual property from the Small Business Innovation [SBIR] Program , although I am no criminal I have almost continuously been involved in court trials involving the theft or destruction of my personal property .The cases have either been not heard , or I allege crooked or unjust with my property taken. All of it with a fraud component, some originating in Philadelphia , Pa. :
Case No. 1447, Spring Term 1998 ,CCP Court of Common Pleas
Dorothy Hartman vs. Dennis Milstein; Greenwich Walk Homeowners et al cases involving fraud and Discrimination .
Mellon Bank et al vs. Dorothy Hartman , Case no.120202759 in State Court
Hartman vs. Mellon Bank et al , Case no.2-13-cv-01909 in Federal Court
More Press Releases
This inventor has been fighting for Justice for a very long time.
See Proposals and Patent Application to Understand Outrage
Endless Crooked or No Trials Hidden From The Public
Time for Justice and a change in what could be more than corruption but criminal behavior." I am a human being and I want a fair trial from the crimes they continue against me... ."
.
in Philadelphia , Pa.
Case No. 1447, Spring Term 1998 ,CCP Court of Common Pleas
Dorothy Hartman vs. Dennis Milstein; Greenwich Walk Homeowners et al cases involving fraud and Discrimination .
Mellon Bank et al vs. Dorothy Hartman , Case no.120202759 in State Court
Hartman vs. Mellon Bank et al , Case no.2-13-cv-01909 in Federal Court
Even Writs to the Supreme Court,
No. 12-10884
Title: Dorothy M. Hartman, Petitioner
v.
Patent and Trademark Office
Docketed: June 20, 2013
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case Nos.: (2013-1070)
Decision Date: March 8, 2013
Rehearing Denied: May 7, 2013
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jun 14 2013 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2013)
Jun 27 2013 Waiver of right of respondent Patent and Trademark Office to respond filed.
Jul 3 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.
Jul 8 2013 Supplemental brief filed by petitioner Dorothy M. Hartman. (Distributed)
Aug 27 2013 Second supplemental brief of petitioner Dorothy M. Hartman filed. (Distributed)
Oct 7 2013 The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 28, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Oct 23 2013 Petitioner complied with order of October 7, 2013.
Oct 31 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 15, 2013.
Nov 18 2013 Petition DENIED.
No. 13-10188
Title: In Re Dorothy M. Hartman, Petitioner
v.
Docketed: May 21, 2014
Linked with 14A7
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
May 13 2014 Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2014)
May 28 2014 Waiver of right of respondent to respond filed.
Jun 4 2014 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014.
Jun 10 2014 Supplemental brief of petitioner filed. (Distributed)
Jun 23 2014 The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 14, 2014, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Jun 25 2014 Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
Jun 25 2014 Application (14A7) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of June 23, 2014, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jul 2 2014 Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.
Jul 3 2014 Application (14A7) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 14, 2014.
Oct 6 2014 Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
Nov 12 2014 Petitioner complied with order of June 23, 2014.
Nov 20 2014 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2014.
Dec 8 2014 Petition DENIED.
Dec 30 2014 Petition for Rehearing filed.
Jan 28 2015 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 20, 2015.
Feb 23 2015 Rehearing DENIED.
Press Releases
African Descendants have been inventing 1000's of years
What Is Not Known about Big Telecom
The Tragic Truth behind Telecommunications
The Inventor's Story in Black and White
- We take for granted now the use of our smartphones , ipads , P.C.'s and other Telecom gadgets but the true background and history of how Telecom launched in the 1990's is yet to be told. An African American woman alleges that she has been persecuted and her entire work career and life has been sacrificed to the power grab and greed surrounding Telecom without Justice .
The above image is a computer generated map by Peer 1 showing millions of internet websites .
Hartman alleges that her abstract thoughts shown below and reflected in the steps of the Accessing Accessibility Process Patent Application #11003123 whose steps she shared in Proposals to the Federal Government explain how Cyberspace is used to allow millions and billions of users online at once . " I am a science teacher, not a technician or code writer , but they would not have been able to build the modern day Internet and worldwide web without my ideas. Stay tuned to this blog to find out more about Hartman's contributions and why she alleges that none of it social media , online shopping , virtual meetings , and the "online experience" would not have been possible . since her ideas were used in the beginning to produce the new Internet , and she is a woman of color , her participation was dismissed and she alleges her life destroyed to prevent payment to her for the invention .
The Inventor's Story in Black and White
The Tragic Truth behind Telecommunications
The Inventor's Story in Black and White
- The Inventor of Online communications which we all now enjoy , Dorothy M. Hartman who alleges that she has been victimized by several unjust trials in an effort to protect her property both real estate and intellectual property after being defamed and denied legal representation based on lies . She alleges cruel and inhumane treatment while being robbed of credit and compensation. They have no right without due process of law .
It started [ see below ] here in the Ct. of Common Pleas in Philadelphia where she sued the condominium association where she purchased a condo on the famous South Street in Philadelphia . From that first contact with judges in the justice system. Well , all Hell broke loose . During deposition , it was discovered that her home based business was Talk Shoppe Inc., the proprietary information regarding the proposed search engine and the fact that she admitted that " I had something to do with developing the Internet'" . Talk Shoppe Inc. was a prototype that she alleges was used by the federal government and gifted to what became the telecom boom with phone and computer makers that were given opportunities to become search engines and successful companies while she was denied funding in the SBIR program .The subpoena for the Housing Inspector was squashed so that he did not have to come to court and thus and her fraud and discrimination charges against the condo association were dropped and began what has amounted to 30 years of lies and fraud outlawing her for standing up for her rights and taking everything I own , the condominium , my next home , and my intellectual property . For me having the nerve to speak truth to power as my punishment I was set up for a fraud fest and have been stripped of everything that I own due to corruption and violations on the part of government employees . So far I am the only one to suffer while the government has empowered and enriched itself and those that it wanted to enrich .
The Tragic Truth behind Telecommunications
The Tragic Truth behind Telecommunications
The Tragic Truth behind Telecommunications
- The Inventor of the successful internet that enables us to be online is an African American woman who in her own life has been subjected to crimes by the government she alleges .
Cases where Due Process was violated or case kept from court or Appeal
Case No. 1447 Hartman vs. Milstein and Greenwich Walk Homeowners Association rt al Case No. 2-13-cv-01909 where her house was taken as civil asset seizure while treated as criminal with fraudulent records made up by' lynch mob 'of judges. No appeals . She had never skipped a mortgage payment until same lynch mob in the courts had a convicted felon come in and trash home and rob renters living there . She had had to rent an apartment to have peace from harassment . Read this Blog to find out more and why she is going to a higher court because of inhumane treatment by a group of powerful and greed obsessed government that got its hand on her intellectual property and refused to let go and opened a flood gate of abuses by others .
Early Contributions by the Inventor to the Field of Telecom
My Invention Came Before Big Tech and Ecommerce
This image shows the Prototype - first Search Engine , ficticious name application for Talk Shoppe Inc. , Entity number 1554833 filed with the Department of State March 5 , 1990 . Hartman alleges that this and other writings to the SBIR predates anything that the government did regarding commercializing or privatizing the NSFNET in 1990-1991.
" I lived my entire life going to school, teaching school and taking care of my family , or inventing things to help people . I never deserved to be treated like this and will take my case to a higher court as Telecommunications and Ecommerce came to be because of my ideas . They got richer because they are able to sell their expensive phones , computers , ads and other gadgets to billions of people online ." But I am the inventor whose ideas put those billions of people online because I invented an internet capable of having billions of people online . They took even my homes while they deny me payment for my invention and get richer They cannot take that away from me and I will fight this evil with all of my strength", alleges Hartman.
below
Patent Application #11003123, Accessing Accessibility
Hartman filed a patent application for a process that showed how to improve the field of Telecommunications . She had introduced her writings to the government in 1990 through the Small Business Innovation Research Program or SBIR . Hartman alleges that the government used ideas submitted to them through the innovation research program to steal and give opportunities to others -Whites and Jews to succeed in Telecommunications while subjecting her to defamation , bankruptcy and other crimes imposed against her. Subscribe to this Blog to learn more as she fights for Justice . Because my invention , the Accessing Accessibility Process was wealth producing the powers that be - crooked judges , dishonest state officers , National Science Foundation , United States Patent and Trademark Offices as well as politicians signing off on it took my property rights by lawless politics using defamation , fraud, and misinformation .
Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia
She won that case , but not another one since as the "lynching cartel of judges " , she alleges" had it in for me". No damages for the fraud and the judge did not even order Mr. Milstein and the others to fix the leaky roof which led to other problems. Although the question was put to the jury and they answered "yes" that the roof was defective when she purchased it but the suit for fraud was declared a non- suit . She had endured racial epithets and insults and other damages to her condominium before filing suit after 4 years . But there was no doubt that retaliation for her filing suit against Milstein and the Greenwich Walk Homeowners Association and knowledge that she was the owner of the TALK SHOPPE INC, prototype were instrumental in setting up both civil and criminal conspiracy to take her property . This attack occured some time after she had submitted proposals about ideas on how to improve telecom to the SBIR and the Dept. of Commerce in Pennsylvania. It was not long before the falsified public records began to surface .Case No.1447 , Spring Term 1998The other cases were directed toward taking her home and all kinds of rules and due process broken . No Appeals ever granted from that day to this one.
Inventor submitted written proposals to government in 1990.....
Inventor alleges that she was forced to file a patent application after government took written proposals submitted in 1990 - shown here on Patent Application page , Case No.
1:20-CV- 000832 , Dorothy M. Hartman vs. The United States .She received notice today , 11/17/2020 that the Judge wrote an 8 page Opinion based on the inventor's complaint alone as the case was not allowed to go to trial. She had to spend $3,000 just to file it as internet agents and agencies that have free rein to her computer including documents and images that they freely made available to themselves and others in the internet community and courts who watched the case with interest .
Being online and a successful internet are contributions by this inventor who is being censured ,
Having contributed her intellectual property near age 50 , the inventor is now in her 70's still struggling to recover from the overwhelming damages done to her by the U.S. government in stealing intellectual property which now brings trillions of dollars into the American economy .They get richer now that Online Protocol ( her ideas ) is now being used all over the world because of the Pandemic . What they are committing against me are crimes against humanity and covering it up without actual trials . My ideas launched Telecom - not theirs and no amount of censuring from my own invention and from social media or other media will change the facts .
See the unfair court cases to take my home which was done not only for greed but retaliation ,,,,
I feel very much as the survivors of Tulsa's Black Wall Street might have felt as working class and middle class blacks were attacked and massacred some feel out of 'white privilege', jealousy and resentment that Blacks were doing well as I was when attacked and my property and assets taken from me while they cover up their atrocities with crooked trials and denied appeals . Describing the inventor as 'criminal and crazy' based on their own lies, opinions among themselves and falsified records.
There were s number of so called race riots that were in actuality massacres of blacks doing well and their assets either burned or stolen .
Inventor alleges that government stole her ideas to produce today's Internet
and that it proceeded to defame , impoverish , and persecute her because of institutionalized racism while enriching itself and its friends with Big Technology and Ecommerce. Inventor alleges that the government used her ideas to build successful internet and start Telecom Boom. Abstract thoughts by inventor that created the tech and ecommerce boom. Abstract thoughts that were submitted in proposals to the government :
A bit (short for binary digit) is the smallest unit of data in a computer. A bit has a single binary value, either 0 or 1. Although computers usually provide instructions that can test and manipulate bits, they generally are designed to store data and execute instructions in bit multiples called bytes.Just like rays of light can be streamed or transmitted so can bytes of data . A hologram is a three-dimensional image formed by the interference of light beams from a laser or other coherent light source. The hologram is not real but formed by the the light rays being broken into points of intersecting light forming the image . Computer bytes of data can also be streamed , intersected and broken into text and images - forming the images shown on a website displaying the shoes that you have selected to see with your click on the computer . Where as the technology community including the Internet Service Providers built the networks with funding from the government , Hartman contributed the ideas of using Cyberspace which is latent in computers and virtual. Virtual meaning 'space that you cannot see nor is it tangible but it exists ' . We know that the nine members of your baseball team inside of your video game are not real but virtual and can be created much like a hologram but in this case created by computer bytes .
The number of ball players in your game can always be increased from 9 to 99 or to 1000 or any other number because they are virtual. Websites can be virtual and the number of consumers or users logging into them can increase. Using this analogy it is easy to see why billions of customers can be online simultaneously. Selling phones, computers , ads to billions of customers could make you a millionaire or billionaire too were you as clever as the tech and ecommerce giants .