How do Courts support certain companies as the Internet?
Did the Courts favor companies that depend on Hartman's Invention or Internet 2 ?
let's talk about patentable and patent law.Hartman’s invention , the Accessing Accessibility Process , Patent Application #11003123 is based on her abstract thoughts , but she placed those thoughts into steps that she allege were stolen by the National Science Foundation in 1990-1991 and then commissioned Merit Networks , IBM, MCI mail and others to apply those ideas to the skeletal network(s) of the government’s or Darpa’s original Internet begun in 1969. I will examine in further writings why the government is wrong in assuming intellectual property by Ms. Hartman without applying proper law .
How come Big Tech companies are classified as the Internet and patented but the INTERNET is not ?
Citing 54.16.330 Universal Citation ?
A public utility district shall not exercise powers of eminent domain to acquire telecommunications facilities or contractual rights held by any other person or entity to telecommunications facilities.
Did Congress change telecom rules and commerce after 1990 ?
Complete overhaul of rules of Commerce and Telecommunication after 1990. Was Ms. Hartman's invention Accessing Accessibility left out while code writers were credited with the invention or did the government assign the invention to itself? Universal Citation : 54.16.330
Hartman used Abstract thoughts to conceive what has a structural and useful outcome.
“The Examiner bears the initial burden … of presenting a prima-facie case of unpatentability ” InreOetiker 977F.2d 1443,1445.24 USPQ2d 1443 ,1444(Fed Cir.1992 ). If the record as a whole suggests that it is more likely than not that the claimed invention would be considered a practical application of an abstract idea , … natural phenomenon , or law of nature, the examiner should not reject the claim.
The abstract thoughts led to a novel structure with practical applications and is therefore patentable.
Was there Collusion amongst branches of Government to violate the constitution for profit ?
The Inventor alleges "yes" for the tool or weapon that it has become and the passage to wealth for many , including those of foreign nations . These blatant violations that have exploited the minority inventor are totally unacceptable. The Inventor has a right to Retribution and to be made whole for the blatant use of Eminent Domain without declaration . Using her personal property to redistribute wealth to itself and those whom it desires to profiteer.
Government took the invention - too great for the inventor?
shipped to foreign govs.
The author claims that she is the Inventor of the Internet and the Worldwide Web and nothing infuriates her more than the image and headlines like ‘this internet inventor ‘and that ‘internet inventor ‘says this , that and the other . The Department of Commerce is the head of Telecommunications now , however it was instrumental in barring Hartman’s patent application as the Department of Commerce is the parent of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and all of its commissioners . All of this information of what the African-American Science Teacher and Inventor alleges is the true origin of the modern day Internet is being hidden while headlines that read Twenty six words that created the internet and Scotus to take up the cases regarding the tech industry when the tech industry has literally been built on the federal government’s sacrificing the inventor’s constitutional andcivil rights . While the Biden administration and Merrick Garland , his Attorney General rule over an illegal court case now in the Appeals Ct. of the Federal Circuit , Case No. 22-1955 Dorothy M. Hartman vs. United States where both courts the trial court Ct. of Federal Claims and the Appeals Ct. for the Federal Circuit are both keeping information from the public that a disabled African-American woman is the true inventor of the Internet and the government from the very start in 1990 stole her intellectual property through its Small Business Innovation Research ( SBIR) program.
She claims that the National Science Foundation and the Department of Commerce misappropriated the property and plagiarized her work and called the resulting internet , the Information Superhighway and launched the intellectual property as the new internet in the early 90’s . Since then the lies , fraud , and misinformation have been fast and furious . Thus far secretive and crooked trials denying Justice .
create trade
The biggest fraud is that the Internet that is now responsible for being global, although the American population apparently never voted for this is presumed to be the intellectual property of the federal government . However the truth and the information that a minority woman had intellectual property that was illegally confiscated from which the Internet that gave rise to Telecommunications and Ecommerce resulted has been kept secret while trillions of dollars have been made on the Nasdaq. The government literally took control by politics and force and has yet to credit or compensate me . This has been filed by Dorothy M. Hartman in these national and federal courts but Hartman alleges that the legal process is being abused . The trial court mixes up the filings and actually misfiles or destroys evidence through omission . She alleges in an effort to make her appear unhinged . The last filings a Brief and Appendices , Document 12 , filed September 10 , 2022 by the inventor Hartman has yet to be admitted to the record and reviewed . The inventor forced to represent myself pro se as a part of the censuring of the truth was to have crooked judges within her own state , Pennsylvania actually blackball her from attorney representation . The Inventor’s Brief and Appendix is being held up by the Courts claiming that it is not in compliance essentially demanding that her brief must be equal or beyond that of multi-million dollar law firms .
After 30 years of seeking justice while the U.S. government
An Internet based in lies produces lies and misinformation ...
- “Just another ploy “, says Hartman “to prevent the public from seeing evidence of how flagrant the violations of the government are against the minority woman regarding the modern day Internet “ . That is her invention not that of the U.S. government . She alleges the Brief that she filed with Appendices contain evidence and proof that not only did the government take the intellectual property through the SBIR program but that the federal government actively involved itself in preventing the awarding a patent for the Accessing Accessibility Process to Hartman.
inventor to file writ of certiorari to supreme court.....
USPTO shows inventor's name and intellectual property used to set up global internet but Courts deny
USPTO shows inventor's name and intellectual property used to set up global internet but Courts deny
USPTO shows inventor's name and intellectual property used to set up global internet but Courts deny
Hartman says federal government has complete control of internet and invention and will seek Justice
USPTO shows inventor's name and intellectual property used to set up global internet but Courts deny
USPTO shows inventor's name and intellectual property used to set up global internet but Courts deny
Patenting an African-American would better than Theft....
Accessing Accessibility Process used to build the Internet
I lived and felt like a human being before sharing my intellectual property with people I could not trust. They literally poisoned my life and me. Deceit , Defamation and Theft. My invention should have been patented and used here to enrich this nation instead of practicing racism and promoting oligarchy .