Inventor lives in Philadelphia , Pa.
I welcome any Law Firm willing to take my case and file it here in Philadelphia in the 3rd District Court . However I can assure you that my complaints are authentic ; the case is filled with indisputable facts , documentation is authentic and extensive ; and there is a history of fraudulent court cases and evidence of destruction of evidence by Judges and you can get paid but the 'INTERNET' the most prolific and pervasive. The case primarily involves the theft of two patent applications by the United States Government in what can only be described as illegal takings by government tyranny involving violations of my constitutional rights , civil rights , and humane rights .
Censure , hacking of my websites including businesses when I was in business , hacking , flagrant and indiscriminate violations of my privacy by Big Tech and Internet Agencies to my electronic devices including computers and printers. My case can be easily proved by a good law firm . What has held things up is abuse and ill treatment of me the inventor , with trials that were secretive and mostly a ruse as the government with the help of others had already misappropriated my intellectual property through its Small Business Innovation Research Program ( SBIR )in the 1990’s . Use of Black Identity propaganda and secrecy and censure about the authenticity of the case and misinformation on the web has contributed to what is mostly FRAUD . This is an abuse by corruptionin the federal government .I am in Philadelphia , Pennsylvania . You will find my address and telephone number in the court documents at pacer .gov .These court cases are referenced at website , https://www.telecomstraighttalk.com/inventor-reflections Quick Contact can be made at email@example.com. Be sure to include the Law Firm and your name in the subject line.
I need lawyers who are good trial lawyers , have good investigative team expecially for cybercrimes and who is color blind when it comes to getting JUSTICE for their clients. See document 41 from Federal Claims Court.
Hartman alleges that Internet 1 or the Internet begun in 1969 by Darpa or the government is entirely different from Internet 2 introduced in early 1990's after her ideas were introduced in commercializing the Internet . Her rights as an inventor were totally violated. She is suing the United States in Case. 2021-1535 in the Appeals Ct. for the Federal Circuit .
A visualization study of inbound traffic measured in billions of bytes on the NSFNET T1 backbone for the month of September 1991. The traffic volume range is depicted from purple (zero bytes) to white (100 billion bytes). It represents data collected by Merit Network, Inc. Visualization by Donna Cox & Robert Patterson, NCSA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
has been hidden from history. The government's prior Internet was no where near capable of carrying traffic as seen on this computerized internet map by Peer 1 , showing millions of websites and users . See her abstract thoughts that Hartman alleges led to the transformation.
Above President Clinton signs Nafta , the Trade Agreement that many Americans feel sucked jobs out of the country leading to goods being manufactured in places like Mexico and China. Those cheap goods being sold back here. Inventor alleges that her ideas were stolen beginning in the 1990's leading not only to trade but to the exporting of Telecom.
Hartman alleges that VP Al Gore may have introduced the Information Superhighway but did not invent nor initiate projects on Climate Change but but Clinton Administration helped itself to her intellect property by way of the government making changes in 1990 using her ideas. She alleges that the new aspects of telecommunications in the 1990's that were never introduced as a new invention but rather was introduced by changes having been made in the Internet through the NSFnet and the Dept. of Commerce were the results of the overwhelming changes wrought by the Government's takeover of her intellectual property while writing her out of history.
Supposedly FREE and OPEN Internet and Net Neutrality had court cases behind the scenes that no one knew about . See U.S. Appeals Ct for the Federal Circuit . IN RE Dorothy M. Hartman vs. United States Patent Office Inventor alleges that the lack of intellectual protection for the Internet Property created right here in the United States is what led to the free give away not only here but abroad unregulated and without stability wasted one of the nation's greatest resources to make a relatively few very rich . Maybe there are other causes for INFLATION !!!!!
1st Step - Misappropriation - stealing my intellectual through the
SBIR Program where I entered into contract with the government to start an online business from home. Since online home businesses were unheard of in 1989-1990 , I shared with them how it could be done introducing Accessing Accessibility to the government in their Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR). They took my work and breached or invalidated the contract on my side .
a) Setting up deliberate schemes to defame and impoverishment to discredit me including (b) the deliberate taking of my homes, first a condominium and then a town home near historic old city Philadelphia. b) They spread lies and rumors calling me "criminal" and "crazy". These lies set up by rogue judges .
2nd Step- To deny patent opportunitie(s) by capturing and building the invention for itself
and illegally taking her personal property including her real estate and intellectual property through illegal civil asset forfeiture branding her and blackballing in public records and legal databases
3rd Step -Illegal Court Case(s) to deny illegal takings of inventor's property from fraudulent activity from the United States Patent and Trademark Office that is an extension of the United States Dept. of Commerce . Case No.1447 in Philadelphia Hartman vs. Milstein , Greenwich Walk Homeowners , et al where defendants were set up to beat fraud charges and allowed to put inventor out of her condominium by refusing to replace defective roof sold with the condo and covered over in sale and the trial , One of the most egregious , In Re Dorothy M. Hartman
Case 2013-1070 in the Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit .
4th Step - President Obama declares her invention a utility -no Eminent Domain declared . Again Federal Intrusion and confiscation without pay.
3rd circuit Appeals Court took my house under a fraudulent mortgage foreclosure and resold it through Sheriff Sale .
Dorothy M. Hartman Science Teacher and Inventor claims that she is the inventor of the Internet - WWW
This information omitted from Internet History. Patent Application fraudulently denied .
National Science Foundation under Department of Commerce changed the Internet after 1990 using ANSnet and Merit Networks , using "my ideas" alleges Inventor