Hartman alleges that Internet 1 or the Internet begun in 1969 by Darpa or the government is entirely different from Internet 2 introduced in early 1990's after her ideas were introduced in commercializing the Internet . Her rights as an inventor were totally violated. She is suing the United States in Case. 2021-1535 in the Appeals Ct. for the Federal Circuit .
A visualization study of inbound traffic measured in billions of bytes on the NSFNET T1 backbone for the month of September 1991. The traffic volume range is depicted from purple (zero bytes) to white (100 billion bytes). It represents data collected by Merit Network, Inc. Visualization by Donna Cox & Robert Patterson, NCSA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
has been hidden from history. The government's prior Internet was no where near capable of carrying traffic as seen on this computerized internet map by Peer 1 , showing millions of websites and users . See her abstract thoughts that Hartman alleges led to the transformation.
Above President Clinton signs Nafta , the Trade Agreement that many Americans feel sucked jobs out of the country leading to goods being manufactured in places like Mexico and China. Those cheap goods being sold back here. Inventor alleges that her ideas were stolen beginning in the 1990's leading not only to trade but to the exporting of Telecom.
Hartman alleges that VP Al Gore may have introduced the Information Superhighway as well as initiate projects on Climate Change but he was not the inventor of Internet 2 by way of the government making changes in 1990 using her ideas. She alleges that the new aspects of telecommunications in the 1990's that were never introduced as a new invention but rather was introduced by changes having been made in the Internet through the NSFnet and the Dept. of Commerce were the results of the overwhelming changes wrought by the Government's takeover of her intellectual property while writing her out of history.
Supposedly FREE and OPEN Internet and Net Neutrality had court cases behind the scenes that no one knew about . See U.S. Appeals Ct for the Federal Circuit . IN RE Dorothy M. Hartman vs. United States Patent Office Inventor alleges that the lack of intellectual protection for the Internet Property created right here in the United States is what led to the free give away not only here but abroad unregulated and without stability wasted one of the nation's greatest resources to make a relatively few very rich .
1st Step - Misappropriation - stealing my intellectual through the
SBIR Program where I entered into contract with the government to start an online business from home. Since online home businesses were unheard of in 1989-1990 , I shared with them how it could be done introducing Accessing Accessibility to the government in their Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR). They took my work and breached or invalidated the contract on my side .
a) Setting up deliberate schemes to defame and impoverishment to discredit me including (b) the deliberate taking of my homes, first a condominium and then a town home near historic old city Philadelphia. b) They spread lies and rumors calling me "criminal" and "crazy". These lies set up by rogue judges .
2nd Step- To deny patent opportunitie(s) by capturing and building the invention for itself
and illegally taking her personal property including her real estate and intellectual property through illegal civil asset forfeiture branding her and blackballing in public records and legal databases
3rd Step -Illegal Court Case(s) to deny illegal takings of inventor's property from fraudulent activity from the United States Patent and Trademark Office that is an extension of the United States Dept. of Commerce . Case No.1447 in Philadelphia Hartman vs. Milstein , Greenwich Walk Homeowners , et al where defendants were set up to beat fraud charges and allowed to put inventor out of her condominium by refusing to replace defective roof sold with the condo and covered over in sale and the trial , One of the most egregious , In Re Dorothy M. Hartman
Case 2013-1070 in the Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit .
4th Step - President Obama declares her invention a utility -no Eminent Domain declared . Again Federal Intrusion and confiscation without pay.
The teacher and inventor very much regrets her contact with the government both through the Small Business Innovation Research Program and the United States Patent and Trademark Office with her personal intellectual property and purchasing personal real estate on South Street and So. 5th Street in Philadelphia as it brought her into contact with high level institutionalized racism , theft , and fraud ...with racial and political implications - Jews and Whites making trillions of dollars from her intellectual property while she is harmed , humiliated and impoverished.....Such were the 'riches of my property that they descended on me like 'jackals out of hell completely robbing me and ruining my life .'
In 3rd Circuit Ct of Appeals in Philadelphia Pa. Judge Paul Diamond remanded what inventor alleges is a fraudulent mortgage foreclosure on her home .
Dorothy M. Hartman Science Teacher and Inventor claims that she is the inventor of the Internet - WWW
This information omitted from Internet History.
National Science Foundation under Department of Commerce changed the Internet after 1990 using ANSnet and Merit Networks , using "my ideas" alleges Inventor