Connecting the dots Begins at the University of Pennsylvania alleges Inventor

Telecomstraighttalk

TelecomstraighttalkTelecomstraighttalkTelecomstraighttalk

Telecomstraighttalk

TelecomstraighttalkTelecomstraighttalkTelecomstraighttalk
  • Home
  • Government Corruption
  • Inventor at Univ. of Penn
  • Inventor at UPENN 2
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Inventor Reflections
  • INTRODUCING INTERNET 2
  • Race Riots or Massacres
  • Other Hartman Inventions
  • Patent Application
  • The Patent and Law
  • Press Releases
  • More
    • Home
    • Government Corruption
    • Inventor at Univ. of Penn
    • Inventor at UPENN 2
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Inventor Reflections
    • INTRODUCING INTERNET 2
    • Race Riots or Massacres
    • Other Hartman Inventions
    • Patent Application
    • The Patent and Law
    • Press Releases
  • Sign In

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • Government Corruption
  • Inventor at Univ. of Penn
  • Inventor at UPENN 2
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Inventor Reflections
  • INTRODUCING INTERNET 2
  • Race Riots or Massacres
  • Other Hartman Inventions
  • Patent Application
  • The Patent and Law
  • Press Releases

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account

See published court opinions below..

13-1070.opinion.3-6-2013.1 Appeals Ct. for the Federal Circuit opinion that affirmed actions by USPT (pdf)Download
Hartman 2008 Comments before FCC. 1st 5 pages (pdf)Download
01513983804. Motion for Reconsideration .32 (pdf)Download
Complaint to current trial court Case No.21-2214.See so called 18 EXHIBITS shown in 145 pages - App (pdf)Download
Brief(1)C Filed by Hartman in CAFC Case 21-1535 (pdf)Download
Supplementary Appendix 1 filed by Hartman in CAFC 1535 (pdf)Download
Supplementary Appendix 2 filed by Hartman in CAFC (pdf)Download

See 1990 proposals submitted to government and patent appli

Here is a Copy of Ms. Hartman's Patent Application submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office  in December 2004, She alleges that she was first to invent the Accessing Accessibility Process used to create the modern day Internet , that debuted after 1990. She was First to Invent and First to File but her homes and intellectual property were  stolen through fraud set up by a group of racist judges who fixed her Fraud and Discrimination lawsuits against Philadelphia realtors and big shots. They defamed her , blackballed her from legal representation and aided the National Science Foundation and the Department of Commerce in taking her intellectual property by FRAUD.Hartman alleges that the Patent Office ignored her priority data submitted in 1990 because the National Science Information took her proposals from the SBIR program and built the new internet without providing any funding or recognition to Hartman. Hartman alleges the crimes and violations of her rights are being held in place by crooked court proceedings that lack precedence and law . Federal employees in Pennsylvania , Washington DC and Alexandria Virginia are not being held accountable and crimes are being upheld by illegal and unfair court rulings because of her race and the wealth of the Internet. Many government employees are still prospering from their investments in Big Tech and Ecommerce that thrived after Ms. Hartman's version of the Internet was installed in the 1990's. Note that there are no Judges assigned from the Appeals Ct. for the Federal Circuit ; Doc.29 ,30 on the Opinion. Is that even legal ?

Here is a copy of Hartman's proposals submitted to government workers in the SBIR Program (pdf)

Download

Incomplete and fraudulently published Patent Application 11003123 (pdf)

Download

FIGURES , Improved figures requested by Patent Office but never added to Application. Other errors . (pdf)

Download

PDF Viewer

Download PDF

Copyright © 2023 Telecomstraighttalk - All Rights Reserved.

  • Inventor at Univ. of Penn
  • Patent Application

Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder