Why is there never any mention of this case on the news or Internet ? Read the Court Trials listed below on this Case . DO NOT BE AFRAID OF THE TRUTH !
Hartman vs. United States :
Ms. Hartman did not give her permission for the government to use her property without asking her permission especially after the Clinton nor Obama administrations declared Eminent Domain violating Ms. Hartman's 5th Amendment rights . Everyone makes a big issue of racial identity politics . This is all this is . “My case is thoroughly documented and should be tried by law . But thus far nothing but propaganda and racial politics and constant breaking of the law . Thus far the case and evidence is being sent down the Rabbit Hole and perhaps Classified Documents debacle that would be more civil and criminal misbehavior as neither Congress , Courts , nor Presidents have the authority to violate property rights of U.S. citizens and then hide their actions . This is an article I found on the Internet yesterday however with many of them using AI freely although it was supposed to be researched and studied first , you do not know what information can be trusted on the Internet . For my case Hartman vs. United States read the following cases . You can find them in Pacer.gov . Contact Pacer if you need help to find them as they have been closed but should still be available . You do not have to be a lawyer to understand basically what is going on in the case if you simply read the documents filed to the docket . The Federal Claims Court has in both its cases Court Case No. 20-0832 and Case No. 21- 2214 has refused to consider that Ms. Hartman was under contract with the SBIR program through her participation in filing her ideas in exchange for funding for her small business but the contract was breached with the letters [affidavits] of her dismissal from the program without any funding . Further the Federal Claims Court refused to accept the Torts committed against her as Torts involved in the Breaching of the contract … Read the following cases in the Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit that finished the Government’s taking of Ms. Hartman’s intellectual property , Accessing Accessibility Process without Eminent Domain and without payment . Hartman alleges that certain judges assigned to these cases knew that they were violating United States ‘ Conflict of Interest Laws ‘ but it was done anyway because the inventor is a minority and now trying to HIDE EVERYTHING THROUGH ILLEGALITY AND SECRECY !!!
“LAW DOES NOT MATTER BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF MY SKIN . NOT ONE OF MY DESIGNS NOT THE INTERNET OR ACCESSING ACCESSIBILITY PROCESS , OR INFANT SAFETY PRODUCTS HAS ANY CODED OR DIVISIVE WORDS SAYING ONE PART OF THE INTERNET DESIGN IS FOR ONE SKIN COLOR AND ANOTHER PART OF THE DESIGN FOR ANOTHER SKIN COLOR . IT AS DESIGNED FOR PEOPLE . PERIOD. YET EVERYTHING SITTING UP ON THE INTERNET AND USING IT EVERYDAY AND KNOWS ABOUT THIS CASE LACKS THE INTEREST OR INTEGRITY TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT . THEY CANNOT GET PAST MY BLACK SKIN AND THEIR OWN GREED AND PREJUDICE. READ IN THE APPEALS COURT FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT , CASES #21-1535 , AND #22-1955 .I INVITE BOTH THE RIGHT AND THE LEFT TO READ THE COURT CASES . IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS I WILL TRY AND ANSWER THEM.”I INVITE BOTH THE RIGHT AND THE LEFT TO READ THE COURT CASES . IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS I WILL TRY AND ANSWER THEM.”
“I did not do a global reset , the U.S. government did using my intellectual property as its own and giving it away "royalty free" to Big Tech and Ecommerce who have made a mint of it while the government monsters tore my life apart with defamation , loss and theft of my homes and other financial assets . When the government by passed my constitutional rights they also bypassed the rights of other citizens. The other citizens are just waking up slowly to the reality of the entire ugly business. They should insist on lawful treatment of my case . It would help the entire nation. But they are so handicapped by racial prejudice . Yes , I am angry but I will continue to pursue the Justice AND Respect that I deserve .”
It was the Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit that set up the wrong Court Opinion in IN RE DOROTHY M. HARTMAN in Case No. 2013-1070 . This inventor alleges that it was deliberately wrongly decided denying her a patent while the government kept control of her intellectual property that it had held since 1990 and have refused to straighten out the wrong . She alleges participation of certain members of the United States Patent and Trademark Office with cooperation by the Dept. of Commerce its parent , National Science Foundation and other government organizations . Do not let a charge of 10 cents per page to review the documents you choose to read keep you from the truth and from a case that might help to unravel some of the corruption .
It started with the destruction of 2 homes , a condominum in Philadelphia where I was defrauded , discriminated against , and essentially thrown out through trials that lacked due process . All matters set up through defamation , fraud, and lies related to me filing intellectual property in the government's Small Business Innovation Research Program .
Began here is Common Pleas Court , Appealed to 3rd Circuit 2nd home taken through civil assest forfeiture before criminal court judge and I am not nor have ever been a criminal . These circumstances set up by bad judges and what became a long list of government players meant to separate me from my property rights . Case No.1447 , Spring Term 1998, 30 years of FRAUD and theft of my property since .
Both geniuses in their fields , both handicapped by illness . Were they defamed , lied about , and their property stripped from them . Of course not . John Nash for those who may be less familiar with him - his story was portrayed by Russell Crowe in A Beautiful Mind. John's health problems were less obvious but he also suffered - a brilliant mathematician , but suffered from hallucinations . Was he called insane , incompetent ? Of course not . Why ??? They are men and belong to the privileged class . Not victimized by racial hatred and run away greed !!!
I DO NOT CLAIM TO BE A GENIUS , NOT EVEN A PERFECT PERSON . HOWEVER I AM INTELLIGENT ENOUGH AND THERE IS NO WAY THAT I SHOULD HAVE BEEN TREATED THE WAY THAT I HAVE BEEN WHILE MY NAME , LIFE, AND REMAINING HEALTH RUINED. IT IS MY INVENTION THAT HAS CONNECTED THE WORLD BUT MY LEGACY STOLEN..
Darpa started the Internet later called the Arpanet or Internet 1 in California in 1969
Arpanet in 1970's
Government's Logic Board for the Arpanet in 1977
Governmen's Arpanet or referred to as "Internetting Projects" circa 1990
I started visiting the SBDC , small business development center in 1989 - submitted my proposals , commercializing telecom and ACCESSING ACCESSIBILITY in 1990 .
Once the government realized the power , money , and growth potential in Ms. Hartman's ideas- It took the intellectual property and ran with it . It threw Ms. Hartman[ The Black in the mix] aside and began to abuse . Except her contributions made all the difference . If the government had not made the transformation , "Mom and Pop" stores would be in existence ; we would still be shopping at the mall and perhaps better off. As the globalization that the government has brought about because of the coding of CYBERSPACE WHICH IS WHY THE GOVERNMENT HAS NOW SHIPPED AN INTERNET THAT HAS NEVER BEEN LAWFULLY THEIRS AS I HAVE NEVER BEEN COMPENSATED FOR MY WORK AND ACCORDING TO THEM THEY ALL INVENTED IT . SEE WIKIPEDIA DEFINITION OF THE INTERNET BELOW.