I Am Woman , Hear Me Roar !

Image from the Washington Post

Black Internet Inventor says” I am extremely proud of all of my sisters and their supporters of all genders”

I hope that the millions of women around the world will start to understand their ability to communicate is due to my contributions

Although the power of women is indeed a R-O-O-A-A-R , because of severe persecution for speaking up about my rights I can only manage a M-E-O-W _ Alpha Kitty

Congratulations to my sisters both of the Marches and Hidden Figures and keep up the good work !

 

Ms. Dorothy M. Hartman alleges that the tremendous expansion and resultant success which went on to build the telecom industry after Commercialization is based on the ideas which she submitted to the federal government seeking funding for her own telecom start-up Talk Shoppe Inc. a prototype telecommunications services company . Hartman who is a Science Educator with a Bachelor of Science Education degree from Pennsylvania State University and a Master of Science Education degree from the University of Pennsylvania says that she taught in her proposals to the federal government in 1990 how to make the telecom industry successful by commercializing it . Because of her love for cats and because she used the handle “Alpha Kitty” during her brief appearance on Twitter – she alleges that videos were made poking fun at the idea of ‘cats’ participating in the invention of the Internet but the true facts are that today’s Internet which was invented in 1990 is indeed her contribution .

It is indeed a fact that the modern day Internet was invented by an African-American woman who has used the handle “Alpha-Kitty”.

The tremendous growth and expansion of the modern day internet or what some refer to as Internet 2 was caused by a transformation in the structure of telecom and how it works . Based on the Hartman model of Accessing Accessibility which is the name that she gave to her proposals – Hartman showed the government that by placing transactions such as the transfer of goods , services ,and , information online would grow Commerce . This inventor was the first to realize that using cyberspace which is latent in computers as an alternate marketplace where transactions could occur would not only be beneficial but profitable . Yet her role has been hidden and her intellectual property rights deliberately ignored . You need only read her blogs here and also at Home of Internet 2 and view her patent application No. 11003123 at USPTO.gov to appreciate the validity of Ms. Hartman’s allegations .

As we are learning more and more about the role that women have played in not only building but maintaining both supportive and leadership roles in advancing the country including those represented in the film “Hidden Figures ” – we understand their need to have their concerns addressed .

Democrats’ Mistake Not Supporting Bernie Sanders

Drain the swamp ?

Dismantling the Office for ethics ?

Does that increase or decrease fraud and corruption ?

From the desk of Dorothy M. Hartman proclaimed inventor of Internet 2

“In my opinion the Democrats only have themselves to blame in losing the election .
They got the analytics wrong . In my brief time on Twitter , I tweeted voluminously to anyone who read the tweets that Bernie Sanders had a better shot at winning the election than Hillary Clinton . The polls even supported that Bernie Sanders had a better chance of defeating Donald Trump than Hillary Clinton but the ‘talking heads’ and the ‘wooden nickels’ would not give him a chance .

Like me many democrats had had enough of the Obama Administration for the past 8 years . It was good to have the first African-American president . Although a lot of us already knew that a black man was just as capable of any other kind to hold the office of the presidency and truly Barack Obama , his wife and daughters are quite attractive and charming . However skin color is not everything and hypocrisy rarely brings positive change .Obama Hypocrisy and Beware the TPP Trojan Horse

Many of us had hoped for real change when Barack Obama took office as Blacks have traditionally been oppressed by previous administrations . Before the present however the Christian principles that went into the making of United States Law were felt – the founding fathers changed the Constitution with the 13th Amendment as the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence were signed by signers declaring principles according to natural law which was interpreted as the law of God . Read more at AmericanHeritage.com . The Civil War was fought and won by the Union under Abraham Lincoln and influence of the abolishioners – people who upheld morality . Further in modern times , under Lyndon B. Johnson , the Civil Rights Law of 1964 was passed for the advancement of colored people . When it comes to draining the swamp , who and what needs to be drained ? criminality comes in different colors and ethnicities Continue reading Democrats’ Mistake Not Supporting Bernie Sanders

Is Justice Blind , Deaf , and Dumb ?

Is Justice Blind , Deaf , and Dumb when it comes to the legal rights of African-Americans ?

Or putting it nicely – ‘ just insensitive to the humanity of Blacks ? ‘

African-American inventor seeks a jury trial through the U.S. Supreme Court for fraudulent mortgage foreclosure

In what is probably another unprecedented move , as this inventor’s struggle has been characterized by bizarre court cases Dorothy Hartman has filed a case in the U.S. Supreme Court seeking a jury trial for what she alleges has been a conspiracy of assault carried out against her for standing up in defense of both her real estate and intellectual property . On June 7, 2016 her home was sold in an illegal Sheriff Sale for $275,000 . Her home which had been appraised at $375,000 was taken from her by an illegal mortgage foreclosure when she had been paying her mortgage on time through automatic deduction from her bank account . The home located in an historic portion of Philadelphia near Penn’s Landing and South Street .Judge Dismisses Claims for Damages to Inventor

Hartman alleges that since 1994 after being the first black to purchase in to a condominium complex , the Greenwich Walk Homeowners Association and having to sue the association and its officers for real estate fraud and discrimination that she and her property have been under constant assault . The cases in two courts as she had been advised by the Housing Supervisor with HUD that she would have to sue separately for the fraud and the discrimination :Court Common Pleas, April Term , 1998 No. 1447 ; EDC No. 99-4695 April 2000 , Dorothy Hartman vs. Greenwich Walk Homeowners Association: Dennis Milstein ; John D’Angelo .

There was nothing remarkable about the cases except the gross violations in Due Process being practiced mostly on an ethnic basis. Dennis Milstein aka Howard Milstein as represented in the court case was vice- president of the homeowners’ association but owned the majority of condominiums in the complex but as it turned out may have been owned by the father , Howard Milstein . John D’Angelo president of the association was the Secretary for the Civil Service Commission for the city of Philadelphia . The secretary was Frank Pryor who was Captain of the 3rd District Police for the City of Philadelphia . Hartman alleges that the fraud charge was dismissed because the Court did not enforce the subpoena for the Housing / Roofing Inspector to come to trial . So the trial was forced to proceed without the material witness with the major charges being dropped and an unanimous jury ruling in her favor for a judgment of $8,000 only on the watered down charge of negligence . The Discrimination case in Federal Court was dismissed on Summary Judgment Mr. D’Angelo who is also an attorney participated in writing a brief for dismissal along with their other lawyers .

The Inventor alleges that she was subjected to a lack of maintenance of her unit and signs around the unit with pornographic slurs , the “N” word , “Jesus, face of evil” and other indignities . She moved and purchased a home further south but still in the same zip code . The racist realtors living in the neighborhood as it is a competitive real estate area with the mean price of homes around $400,000 continued to harrass her and so did their friends in city’s civil service commission agencies . Again the fraud was rampant mostly in retaliation for her lawsuits against Milstein , D’Angelo , and Pryor – two of whom were city employees . The participation of city employees to produce fraudulent certification resulted in serious damages to her as there were undisclosed and serious problems regarding the property that should have been disclosed . They , the symbiotic relationship between realtors and city workers who did ‘pay to play’ favors for them bullied her and vandalized her house and automobiles . The 3rd District police did nothing because ” they knew who was involved and refused to investigate “, alleges the Inventor .

Once the source of bigotry and corruption that she had encountered in purchasing the condo on South Street found out that she was an inventor with allegations concerning the Internet – she claims ” It got way worst . The racism and meanness were palpable. I was literally under attack by a lynch mob stemming from realtors associated with the neighbors’ association living in the neigborhood , city employees , and their friends in the Courts . The abuses included throwing trash around the home overcharging on utilities, stripping her cars , flattening tires and the 3rd district police did nothing. Once they found out about her fight for justice with her contributions to the Internet – someone in the top level of the Courts forged derogatory documents regarding the court case Dorothy Hartman vs. Greenwich Walk Homeowners Association . These defamatory documents based on lies were distributed to Lexis.Nexis , a legal commercial database ruining her name and reputation with public documents to discredit her . She is continuing to be blackballed from legal representation by what she alleges to be “illegal court reporting” . ” I was forced to represent myself Pro Se as this defamation to discredit me goes to the top of the Courts . “Therefore whether I cite the law correctly or not , whether or not facts and evidence are substantial in the case – my rights are steamrolled over and I am portrayed as ‘crazy’ for representing myself while they blackball me from representation by a real lawyer . Then I become the scapegoat for crimes committed by frauds and bigots. That is the epitome of racism . I have presented this as a part of my case before the U.S. Supreme Court . I am hoping for justice in this situation “, argues the Inventor .

She continues , “The Bank of America and the Bank of New York Mellon colluded with the defamation to discredit being distributed by Court Reporting to deny me the opportunity to refinance my loan . It was a ‘turkey shoot’ . While the neighbors using a convicted felon who claimed that he ‘grew up in the neighborhood’ to trash my home – causing an $8000 disruption in the flow of my income – the bank would not allow me to fix the default on my mortgage . After the trashing of the home – it took me approximately 3 months to recover from that . When I started asking the bank for the opportunity to cure the default I was in arrears of only $7100 and able to pay . After running up a balance in the arrears of over $70,000 – the Bank demanded to be paid or carry out the fraudulent mortgage foreclose . Because of the trashing of the home by the other perpetrators – the inventor was not in position to deal with other lenders . The destruction of the home amounted to ‘Tortuous Interference’ but the courts ignored all of this . The federal judge , Paul Diamond ignoring evidence to the contrary remanded the case from Federal Court where it belonged to State Court where an In Rem fraudulent mortgage foreclosure was rammed through with a wrongful lawsuit in the wrong court of jurisdiction . The Bank(s) colluding with the city government and the courts in what can only be described as a civil conspiracy to assault me for standing up for my property rights – both with my house and my invention set up the illegal take away of my house ” , says the inventor . “This is about virulent racism and runaway greed and retaliating against me for daring to speak truth to power and oppression .”

Patent Commissioners Letter 05.24.2012

Patent Commissioners Letter 06.19.2012

The entire case and everything having to do with my property rights has been predicated upon jealousy of the achievements of an African-American woman , racial hatred , elitist narcissism , and greed . The Inventor has been subjected to endless and unjust court cases . She has filed this matter with the United States Supreme Court because she alleges that the abuse of the law , violations in lack of Due Process have been overwhelming and that this case concerning the illegal take away of her home where perjury has been allowed on the part of the judge , the defense attorneys , and evidence has been completely disregarded is an affront to the United States Justice System .

Where does Rule of Law end and criminality in the courts begin when oppressing the rights of minorities is one of the questions posed to the Supreme Court in reference to this matter

. This woman says that she has suffered too much for simply being intelligent and helping other people as well as helping herself . She is still hopeful that Justice will prevail . She is hoping that the Supreme Court will issue a Writ of Certiorari in reference to the Opinion of the 3rd Circuit Ct. of Appeals and overrule the district judge which has closed this case with egregious damages in place against her without resolution and relief . Can you believe that she has had to file a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court just to get a jury trial on this matter . That is how overwhelming the injustice regarding this case has been . Hartman alleges that the matter has been kept from trial to avoid public disclosure of the many ways that her rights are being violated . She is hoping for better . The case to be reviewed in conference in January by the Justices of the Supreme Court.

NSFNET CONSORTIUM

NSF.DecisionC.1990.AuthorizesNSFNET.for.Commercial.Use

The beginning of Internet 2 - Merit Networks and others commissioned by NSF to prepare telecom for Commerce .
The beginning of Internet 2 – Merit Networks and others commissioned by NSF to prepare telecom for Commerce .

Above is a copy of a letter to the Patent Commissioner by the Inventor . Also a copy of his letter back to her , stating that her patent application for invention of the Internet ( Internet 2 or the modern day Internet ) was being denied because the Internet had been in existence for more than one year when she filed her application . However she was First to Invent and First to File . The one year statute in this case could not be applied because the government had started using the invention or new ideas without public disclosure . See the Notes from a meeting of congress in 1992 which showed that the National Science Foundation (NSF) approved Commercialization of the telecom networks in November 1990 .

Since it would have been a violation of the constitutional rights to the Inventor and there was clear evidence of that the government had used her intellectual property without public disclosure – the United States Patent and Trademark Office could not deny her application No. 11003123 , the Accessing Accessibility Process based on the 1 year statute . “Therefore the Patent Office had to get more inventive for its reasons for denial and I still allege that it committed fraud .” The Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit upheld the Patent Office Decision in the following Opinion released in 2013 . “The one good thing that I find about the opinion is that the Court did not rule out that the intellectual property is mine” . 13-1070.opinion.3-6-2013.1

Post update : The U.S. Supreme Court Denied Inventor/Petitioner’s Writ of Certiorari to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the Orders of Judge Paul S. Diamond and grant a jury trial in the matter regarding what she alleges was an illegal seizure of her home .

About Technological Advancement In Business

1989 Mac Computer by Apple .tropicalcyclocross.com
1989 Mac Computer by Apple .tropicalcyclocross.com
1987 Mobile Phone by Motorola .Blogspot.com
1987 Mobile Phone by Motorola .Blogspot.com

“Not without creativity first” , says Inventor suffering devastating losses because of actions by the Obama administration

“The Federal Government and the tech community did not do it all by themselves.”

So says retired Science Teacher and black Internet Inventor , Dorothy M. Hartman , “The Internet is stolen intellectual property”

The Internet did not go from this representation

1987 Internet
1987 Internet
Arpanet Logical Map March 1977
Arpanet Logical Map March 1977
to this representation by invention of the mobile phone or computer but by a Business Method marrying business to technology
Computer generated Internet Map by Peer 1 illustrating billions of websites
Computer generated Internet Map by Peer 1 illustrating billions of websites

The race of the inventor has to be mentioned because it is the primary reason why she has been written out of Internet history and technology advancement although her contributions are the driving creativity behind this 20th century invention .The Internet now consists of billions of users all over the world . Technology did not do this all by itself and neither did the Federal Government says Hartman . It is said that Al Gore did not invent the Internet , but nothing is ever said about who did . The Internet did not suddenly appear out of nowhere and it was not a natural extension or evolution of the original “Internetting Projects” under the Arpanet created by Arpa in 1969 .

The present day Internet is a result of changes made to the prior telecom structures retired and parked with the government under the National Science Foundation as the NSFnet . Dorothy M. Hartman , retired Science Teacher and founder of ABFY SELLERS GROUP INC. alleges that her ideas on how to improve Telecommunications were used by the National Science Foundation to Commercialize or set up the residual telecom structures for privitization . This enabled the access of telecommunications for use by businesses and ordinary consumers to transact exchanges of information and services across cyberspace . Hartman’s ideas of using cyberspace which has been inherent in computers since their invention in 1967 as a warehouse or virtual marketplace for exchange is what revolutionized Telecommunications in the 1990’s leading to what was first called the Information Superhighway and later morphing into a seamless Internet structure which can be accessed all over the world and outside of it limited only by the need for the necessary equipment . The virtual marketplace which is really Hartman’s contribution is the center of the Internet’s success . The Internet itself is now responsible for more technological achievements than any other invention in history . The inventor has been completely disrespected and robbed of a considerable fortune because of theft of her intellectual property and violations of her civil rights .

There would be no modern day Internet or terrific technological achievements without her intervention . Hartman’s ideas were truly novel and revolutionary but this woman’s invention and legacy have been taken over by the Federal Government and given over to corporations and public use with no compensation or acknowledgment to her . Hartman says because of her race , gender , and handicap the trifecta of discrimination and exploitation. It is a blatant injustice that needs to be corrected .Computers sold out of garages

1989 Mac Computer by Apple .tropicalcyclocross.com
1989 Mac Computer by Apple .tropicalcyclocross.com
1987 Mobile Phone by Motorola .Blogspot.com
1987 Mobile Phone by Motorola .Blogspot.com
Henry T. Sampson -Black Man Who invented the Cell Phone
Henry T. Sampson -Black Man Who invented the Cell Phone
Read more here The Cell Phone turns 40 Read here tagged by some as the so called
Dr. Philip Emeagwali
Dr. Philip Emeagwali
“Father of the Internet ” , a title given to Vinton Cerf as Emeagwali has been recognized for his work with Supercomputers . Dr. Philip Emeagwali built supercomputer

Hartman says that she has not been recognized because President Obama and his Attorney General Eric Holder sacrificed her intellectual property rights to corporations and banks and that she has been under attack by local corruption and bigotry as a result of the flim-flam politics being carried out during the so called ‘ Free and Open Internet’ debate. She alleges that this was all a smokescreen while out of the media and out of the spotlight her patent application was being denied although she was First to Invent and First to File . She was called “crazy” because she suffers from Panic Disorder a condition suffered by millions of people but hers is complicated by more serious health problems . This used as an excuse to rob her of credit and opportunity while Obama threw his support to all the corporations that have grown rich because of the changes wrought to the Internet and the Banks which he bailed out from the start of his presidency . Other inventions other than the Internet have been robbed from her while her name , reputation , and home have literally been under assault .

Dorothy Hartman , the Inventor wrote the Accessing Accessibility Process (Which is a business method that shows how to use cyberspace in technology and when reduced to practice comprises the Internet ) on a similar model of the Mac Computer shown above. This process revolutionized telecommunications and produces the ever expanding successful Internet of today . Earlier on mobile phones and computers had not met with success until more Internet users and service providers were added after the spurious growth of telecommunications after changes wrought to Internet after 1990. This led to an increase of users on the Internet which led to an increase in the sales of cell phones , mobile phones , computers , and all of the equipment and tools including software to run them :

Internet use dramatically increased after 1990
Graph shows that as the movement of data packets increased with more users , more Internet Providers were needed

It Starts With An Idea

Barack Obama dismisses contributions to the Internet by Black Inventor

It all begins with ideas and ideas are not race specific so there should be no confusion regarding intellectual property and race 6

Alexander Bell may have built the first telephone but he did not build telephone systems and telephone companies . Marconi invented the telegraph but he did not build telegraphing systems and companies . The point is creativity begets ideas and ideas generally come from individuals . Hartman alleges that not only have her ideas regarding the Accessing Accessibility Process which led to the Internet Patent Application No. 11003123 found on the USPTO.gov website but other ideas including the Auto Seat for Infants and Toddlers were stolen from her within the Patent Office itself .

Other inventions by Hartman

Other inventions by Hartman

Ideas for the Infant Basket are actually being borrowed against her wishes she claims because even though she owns the patent on that one – she cannot defend it as it takes millions of dollars to do that .Since trying to protect her intellectual property regarding the Internet she has spent thousands of dollars in legal fees to fight defamation and even the illegal seizure of her home . However even the Opinion written by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals indicates that her claims were about how much the Internet would be improved by her proposals .13-1070.opinion.3-6-2013.1

She asserts that is the reason why she wrote the proposals and that is the reason why she claims that ” The National Science Foundation jumped all over it .” They recognized especially through her proposed use of Cyberspace for various transactions that adding commercial capability which was something that had been frowned upon within the telecom community which had been in existence since its founding days within ARPA – would immensely impact commerce and the economy . This is what her writings did . They opened the eyes of the telecom technological community to the possibilities of what using such a platform which would enable participation by billions to do . They made one very big mistake they left the Inventor out . Barack Obama enlisted democratic senators Smith and Leahy to come up with a new patent law to deny the patent application by the African-American female inventor Dorothy M. Hartman . Inventor alleges that this was all under the guise of net neutrality and free and open internet when the Internet was already free and open for consumers and businesses as proposed in Hartman’s writings . The corporations that charge for access to the Internet are the ISPs ( Internet Service Providers ) , phone and computer makers , and ads on social media . Hartman alleges that her application had already been in the patent office for 4 years ( longer than usual ) before Barack Obama took office . She alleges that he came in deferring to corporations and banks in “bailing out banks”. She alleges that this is what initiated the runaway greed and an economy taken over by oligarchs while at the same time making “populist” speeches. “While providing health care for everyone is a very good thing , the giveaways to insurance companies and pharmaceuticals which raised their premiums and prices made it difficult to maintain. Hopefully the policy will be retained but revised.”

Hartman alleges that right on the heels of her letter to Frank Campo of the U.S. Small Business Administration , images shown here ( Some portions redacted for privacy reasons- click to enlarge images ) 05-21-2015 05;59;26PM
05-21-2015 05;50;58PM that the National Science Foundation made its announcement about Commercialization of the NSFnet and that ANS , a consortium of Merit Networks , IBM , MCI and others had been commissioned to carry out the transformation. This occurred in November 1990 .
05-21-2015 05;39;19PM05-21-2015 05;31;48PM Hartman alleges that this was done to essentially ‘wipe her name’ out of the process and give the transformation credit to those already in the industry . Her documents and correspondence with numerous government employees and her intellectual property ultimately consumed by the National Science Foundation supports her allegations .They went on to develop Internet 2 which has led to big things just as her writings predicted in her writings

    The Feasibility of Accessing Accessibility

:

This was the invention of Internet 2 , not a telephone or computer , but a business idea .
This was the invention of Internet 2 , not a telephone or computer , but a business idea .
The  use of Accessing Accessibility or preparing the Networks for Commerce led to transition resulting in Internet
The use of Accessing Accessibility or preparing the Networks for Commerce led to transition resulting in Internet

You will not find Hartman’s names on the history pages regarding the Internet but it would not be the first time that African- Americans have not been credited for their inventions or creativity . Although some of them have received patents , Hartman among them as she has received 2 patents they are rarely given the opportunity to prosper from their own creativity We Did It , They Hid It As huge as the Internet has become and still expanding – it is amazingly simple for the big wigs to forget where the ideas originated. The whole world knows that Al Gore did not invent the Internet , but very few people know who did . Also see

“When the National Science Foundation commissioned Merit Networks to Commercialize the NSFNET ( the remaining skeleton of the defunct arpanet ) , the new Internet or Internet 2 was invented and it was invented based on my writings and input to the United States Small Business Administration and two other government agencies . The internet was so new in 1993 that navigating it had to be taught to new users . The public has never used the former Internet based on the Arpanet . The public only knows the use of this Internet as the public never used the previous one begun and invented in 1969 under Darpa New Internet in 1993 had to be learned

Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights of Afro-Americans

john-nash51pb1w2ga9lrusselcrow-thdr-stephan-hawking-57e5659fc4618882098b4611

Black Internet Inventor still struggles for justice for Internet development

Inventor consistently denied a jury trial and justice

Is it just race and criminal justice ?

Black female inventor who claims modern day Internet is her invention alleges unjust court rulings and abuse by the civil justice system

Where is her name in the history of the Internet ?
History says that African-American inventors are good enough , says Hartman .

What does a disabled African-American woman have in common with the above intellectual giants ? “Certainly not intellect ” , Hartman is quick to say . Dr. John Nash (left to right ) who was presented by Russell Crowe in the movie , ” A Beautiful Mind” was a nobel prize winner for his mathematical genius useful in economics. Dr. Stephan Hawking is a renown theoretical physicist ( bottom right ). There is no comparison but it suffices to say that all are disabled . Whereas she has been ridiculed and called “crazy” because her disability includes nervous disorders with other conditions, has been lied about and her character defamed to discredit her allegations – the above men are of course of a different race and she says that makes all the difference in the world . They are revered and respected for their contributions – their handicaps not withstanding. She has 2 patents and argues that she should have had 2 more , but for the huge success of her ideas including the INTERNET – she has been discriminated against because of her skin color :

Other inventions by Hartman
Other inventions by Hartman
Inventor's work as a Science Instructor in Temple University Bio-Medical Sciences Program
The Inventor’s work as a Science Instructor in Temple University Bio-Medical Sciences Program
Teaching Science oriented minority high school students
Teaching science oriented minority high school students

Ms. Hartman does not have a doctorate degree but says that she was offered opportunities to pursue both a Doctorate degree as well as to pursue medicine but health problems interfered with severe onset around age 24 . She does not claim to be a genius but she does not deserve to be robbed of her intellectual property and not compensated a dime for it and have her character defamed including the illegal seizure of her house for daring to stand up for her property rights ! She was and continues to be instrumental in Internet development .

She argues that she is not “chopped liver” as she completed a Bachelor’s Degree in Education majoring in Biology and Physical Science from Pennsylvania State University and a Master of Science Education majoring in Chemistry and Biology from the University of Pennsylvania . Her transcript below :Inventor’s Transcript from University of Pennsylvania Further her inventions help billions of people although she has not been given any credit . Her work set up by fraud in the patent office to be taken over by corporations and the running over of her rights as a Pro Se litigant as she has literally been prevented from hiring attorneys because of smear and defamation campaigns designed to discredit her . Her contributions and inventions help billions of people Other inventions by Hartman Internet development was stymied until she introduced her writings about how to use cyberspace which is latent in computers as an alternative marketplace enabling customers and businesses to interact directly with each other .

It has been 26 years since this woman invented the creative ideas that have forever changed the function and character of the Internet– making it possible for it to even extend beyond the boundaries of earth– she is still being disregarded by a government that took the ideas and ran with them without compensating her. “The rules changed when I became involved”, says Inventor.” It generally takes 2-4 years for patent application prosecution I asked to expedite my application when I first filed in 2004– although it was not docketed until 2005. My money was refunded rather than allow me to expedite the application “.Click on images to enlarge them .blog-image-1-request-to-expediteblog-image-2-money-refunded

What about African-American intellect and contributions ? Dorothy M. Hartman alleges that she is as much a part of Internet History as all the other so called founders as she says that’ there would be no internet had it not been for the National Science Foundation ordering the “Commercialization of Telecommunications in 1990. Merit Networks along with IBM was commissioned for this project by the NSF which had been in charge of the NSFNET which really was a holding place for the retired Internet (the one based on having the ARPANET as its core ). Today’s Internet which is different from the previous Internet which had been discontinued but was transformed by the new ideas and the NSF commission to Merit Networks in 1990. Her contributions made Internet Development different enabling a singular integrative system .

She claims that the success with the Internet which began with the transformation to privitization literally began with ideas that she submitted to the federal government starting in 1989 when she visited the Small Business Administration location at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Between this blog and its sister blog at Home of Internet 2, you can learn more about this side of Internet internet development. It is not just Race and the criminal justice system but the civil justice system is a challenge for African- Americans as well especially relating to social , cultural , and intellectual property rights .

Hartman alleges that she was met with resistance from the beginning and as is mostly the case when African-Americans become involved especially in projects which may become well known or successful financially and ‘elitists’ or those who consider themselves ‘superior’ are in competition– the rules are changed.” I was told my patent application would take 12 years their letter to me dated 6/6/6.” See below.blog-image-lttr-12-years

The change- although her proposals form a paper trail of correspondence between her and federal and state employees reviewing her proposal on Accessing Accessibility which is a business process which marries technology and commerce to business– was received and ideas copied– she essentially has been ignored since. Only after 1999 and the passing of the American Inventor’s Act did business ideas become patentable. The growth of the Internet really began to take off around 2004 as more users and internet service providers increased.2004 increase in internet users 2004-increase-in-internet-users

However because it became a huge success just as she wrote that it would and changed commerce and the way the world does business forever– as success grew and the government funded corporations and other internet protocol companies that were already involved in the field– GREED, RACISM, and OPPRESSION proliferated right along with the Internet. The supposed movement for “Free and open Internet” was nothing more than a smokescreen for companies which have become rich because of the changes in the Internet behind the scenes lobbying against the patent application which was decided 2012-2013. There are billions and trillions of dollars in the industry and in some ways the economy has been run into the ground. Ms. Hartman who is more responsible for the ideas that made today’s internet a success than any other party has been completely ignored since her ideas were read in the 1990’s. She is still seeking Justice as an African-American inventor as she feels that the theft of her intellectual property and legacy is blasphemous as using anyone’s property and trading on that without injuring the person and compensating for that injury is both ethnically and morally wrong. The abuse of power by authorities using systemic racism to abuse the constitutional and civil of African-Americans is fundamentally wrong. “Justice for African-Americans is long overdue.” Injustice involves more than the criminal justice system

Those in Ecommerce and Technology which have now become hugely successful fields did not even understand how today’s Internet which was first dubbed the’ Information Superhighway’ worked. It is only since I started blogging about it around 2011 that those in the industry began to understand how the Internet worked . Even those who built the phones and computers , code , etc. did not invent the concepts of the Internet only used them with proficiency to sell their wares to millions then billions of people , enriching themselves .” ‘ When I realized that the federal government was just going to settle for the Supervisory Taking of my intellectual property (which is a violation under the 14th and 5th amendment) in that they have snatched the property to use for population without declaring Eminent Domain or compensating me , the inventor in anyway I filed for a patent protect my legal rights ).Below is a partial list of state and federal employees associated with SBIR ( Small Business Innovation Research) and other plans associated with funding small businesses who reviewed her proposals – the National Science Foundation being the ultimate recipient of these innovations and funding requests .”blog-images-3-fed-employees-that-reveiwed-proposals My contributions do not include being treated like slave chattel while others enrich themselves from my invention and I go unpaid with my rights forsaken and abused .”

This is wrong and a violation of the Inventor’s civil and constitutional rights. Additionally a local federal judge and the Court(s) have further persecuted her by the illegal seizure of her home– caused by a fraudulent mortgage foreclosure that was allowed to be carried out in the wrong court of jurisdiction.Inventor’s Home Vandalized and Illegally Seized While intellectual contributors or other inventors to inventions or discoveries that have advanced the population– this inventor has been smeared in defamation campaigns and continuously subjected to violations in Due Process. She has filed the matter regarding her illegally confiscated home in the Supreme Court– still hoping for some kind of relief from misapplication of racism, oppression, and law. Cultural and intellectual property rights involve more than just the elites .

Dorothy M. Hartman alleges that she is as much a part of Internet History as all the other so called founders as she says that’ there would be no internet had it not been for the National Science Foundation ordering the “Commercialization of Telecommunications in 1990. Today’s Internet which is different from the previous Internet which had been discontinued but was transformed by the new ideas and the NSF commission to Merit Networks in 1990.

Because it became a huge success just as she wrote that it would and changed commerce and the way the world does business forever– as success grew and the government funded corporations and other internet protocol companies that were already involved in the field– GREED, RACISM, and OPPRESSION proliferated right along with the Internet. The supposed movement for “Free and open Internet” was nothing more than a smokescreen for companies which have become rich because of the changes in the Internet behind the scenes lobbying against the patent application which was decided 2012-2013. The general population deserves to know the full information about internet development and the history of the Internet . American intellectual history shows that inventing is not a game that is limited to those that consider themselves elitists and superiors .

Where is Evidentiary Law ?

Enough !

Where is Justice ?
Where is Justice ?

Enough unlawful court cases that never see the light of day.

Internet Inventor never sees a lawful or public trial.

Dorothy M. Hartman who is the only Internet Inventor with claims to the Internet that are backed by evidence , documents , and potential witnesses says that she continues to suffer from the absence of law in endless court cases where lack of due process is continuously applied . Although corporately owned main stream media continues to black out her story in the press – nevertheless we have known since the Federal Appeals Court ruling in 2013 of this woman’s fight for justice . That opinion although not widely known has been published 13-1070.opinion.3-6-2013.1 in which the Court basically affirmed the decision by the Patent Office not to grant a patent .

Hartman alleges that she has never desired to ‘rule over the Internet’. ” I am its inventor and only I know or have known the scope of it and the entire idea is not feasible because of the greatness of it – although I do not agree that it is not patentenable because it represents a transformation from the original and it is attached to the use of machinery and therefore is not indefinite . As for not being in one or two sentences – that could have been remedied had I been given the opportunity to edit my claims which I was not . As a matter of fact my original claims were illegally removed by the Patent Office . It was never intended which is clear in my original proposals and writings that any one person or thing should rule over the Internet . It was always meant to be for businesses and ordinary consumers which was the intent of my writings Inventor’s Proposal in 1990 to change Telecom.

The purpose of filing for a patent was that it was the only way to reserve my legal rights as I had tried since 1990 to work within the system – but have been completely mistreated and denied . It is not bad enough apparently that they rob me of billions of dollars worth of intellectual property that is mine – without so much as a nod in acknowledgment and compensation but they have abused me with the takeover and the illegal seizure of my personal property purchased with a life time of work which is an abuse of law .

Where is the law when it comes to the rights of African-Americans ? Where is integrity and judgment ? How do you distinguish between the lawful and the criminal in what is being accepted as supposedly rulings by a court . Hartman alleges that the numerous court cases in which she has become involved do not pass the legal smell test not only because she alleges to be at the very least one of the inventors of what is one of the greatest inventions in the world – but because she has dared to try and fight back against the perpetrators who unfortunately are led by government . Their crimes against us acceptable since they are being carried out against Blacks , who are apparently according to their superciliousness less than human beings .

Her home which was recently confiscated and sold at Sheriff’s Sale back in June 2016 after being vandalized . She alleges was a result of a Civil Conspiracy among the Courts in Pennsylvania to deny her civil and constitutional rights as none of them would hear an appeal on the matter . She alleges in retaliation to her speaking truth to power and the abuse of that power against the rights of African-AmericansInventor’s home vandalized . “Blatant perjury , and out an out lies as shown by the Record of the court case(s) were profusely used to allow a Kangaroo Court in State Court to confiscate my home when I had been paying my mortgage by automatic deduction from my bank account and had a 705 credit rating .”

The Bank of New York Mellon in a fraudulent scheme that was clearly not a legal In Rem foreclosure but had been manipulated by the Bank of America which previously had denied me a refinance at the time when higher interest rates were being lowered because of actions by the federal government . I filed a complaint against the Bank with the Comptroller of the Currency . There was collusion between the bank(s) and the City of Philadelphia which used negative Court Reporting to libel my name and reputation to set up the illegal take away of my home .

When they filed the illegal mortgage foreclosure in the Court of Common Pleas , Hartman filed her case in federal court hoping that her rights would be protected . However what she alleges was an activist judge , Paul S. Diamond ruled on ethnicity to protect his political interests . The perpetrators who consisted of racist realtors with whom she had to contend from the time she bought real estate in a historic part of Philadelphia and their cronies within city government participating in’pay to play’ schemes in real estate corruption were allowed to get away with their attack on her home and automobiles. This is an abuse of the law . Where is evidentiary law ? Since the nation watched Rodney King be beaten within an inch of his life with so many in the population denying what their own senses saw and detected there is a tendency at least by the Justice System to overlook evidence when dealing with rights concerning Blacks .

An activist judge in Philadelphia who was supposed to administrate the matter in Federal Court which was the proper court of jurisdiction because of the violations of both her civil and constitutional rights by these powerful agencies and which she had reported to federal agencies like the Office of Thrift Supervision , Comptroller of the Currency and Hud completely ignored evidence of federal questions . The judge remanded what the inventor alleges is a phony foreclosure case back to State Court which was the wrong court of jurisdiction so as to force through an illegal mortgage foreclosure that had been manipulated by the power brokers themselves. The inventor alleges that this was an abuse of law .

It was clearly predatory and fraudulent

but it was forced through State Court as a mortgage foreclosure and the sheriff sale held shortly after . Every Pennsylvania Court denied an appeal on the matter . Although the inventor immediately appealed the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court , thus far , the case has not been docketed. The illegal sale occurred in June 2016 and she had filed her objections and appeal to the Supreme Court in July 2016 within the allotted time for an appeal . What is happening with evidence and the law ? Especially when it comes to abuse of the law in cases involving black Americans ? Violations of Federal Rules of Evidence are serious jurisprudence infractions – yet this is not the least of failures in Due Process experienced by the Inventor .

The obvious lack of due process which was allowed by a federal judge – holding the hearing in the wrong court of jurisdiction and further on the date of the hearing the case was moved from the civil court judge to a criminal court judge .” Yet it was the perpetrators who attacked me not me attacking them . They vandalized my automobiles and my house creating an $8,000 interruption in my income which caused me to miss approximately 3 months on my mortgage payments . The trashing and the vandalism done by a convicted felon known by the perpetrators and which the city of Philadelphia refused to lock up or even allow me to file charges against him .

Where is the law when it comes to the rights of African – Americans ?

Within 3 months when the arrears on my mortgage were approximately $7100 I appealed to the Bank of America to allow me the opportunity to repair the default – which the bank refused to do opting instead in its collusion with negative Court Reporting by the City of Philadelphia deliberately libeling me and defaming my character to set up an illegal seizure of my home .

Because I had spoken up about the abuses and even participated in the research done by the Committee for Racial and Gender Bias in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Pa. Supreme Court Committee Report on Racial and Gender Bias in Pa. Justice System
Pa. Supreme Court Committee Report on Racial and Gender Bias in Pa. Justice System
. I had filed charges against city VIP’s for fraud and discrimination in the case of Dorothy Hartman vs. Greenwich Walk Homeowners Association – Dennis Milstein – so I was set up for Retaliation – an illegal set up to take my house without any appeals a part of that persecution . Federal Rules of Evidence repeatedly ignored in court cases and violations in Due Process are the norm rather than exception in the proceedings .

“Further how dare I a Negress to allege contribution to what has become their precious Internet after stealing my ideas in 1990Inventor’s Proposal in 1990 to change Telecom . I am being facetious of course but not really, ” says inventor,” because that and those who consider themselves above the law lies at the core of it all” . The perpetrators were all dismissed by the Federal Judge Paul S. Diamond real lawyer’s judge ? dropped the case in federal court . Dropping the case on a 16- page order issued just as the Banks had been issued summons and were supposed to appear in Court and answer the charges , throwing out and disregarding evidence of federal questions , and potential witnesses but allowing the illegal confiscation of her home for damages of $331,999.95 . The Inventor alleges that these acts by the perpetrators were illegal – and that even those taken by the Court were outside of legal jurisprudence within the U.S. and cry out for justice . The Court(s) have prevented her from legal representation by libel and defamation while allowing blatant abuse of due process. Not only has she been stripped of her property rights but apparently her rights as a citizen and human being .

Where is the law

She is asking the Supreme Court of the United States to review this case .

You can view the cases online at Pacer.Gov. Pacer is available to anyone for a small fee ( fee is charged according to the number of documents one views ) – you may view the cases online . The State Case is in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia and the Case number is 120202759 in which the Bank of New York Mellon et al vs. Dorothy Hartman . Dorothy Hartman vs. Bank of New York Mellon et al and in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No.3157 EDA 2015 The other Case is 2:13-cv-01909, Dorothy Hartman vs. Bank of New York Mellon et al in the District or Federal Court in Eastern Pa. located in Philadelphia .The Inventor is appealed the matter in the U.S.Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit , Case No. 15-1318 , which denied Appeal but granted Summary Judgment in favor of the banks .

What of Black Intellect ?

Black Internet Inventor still struggles for justice for Internet development

Inventor consistently denied a jury trial and justice

Is it just race and criminal justice ?

Black female inventor who claims modern day Internet is her invention alleges unjust court rulings and abuse by the civil justice system

Where is her name in the history of the Internet ?

What does a disabled African-American woman have in common with the intellectual giants ? “Certainly not intellect ” , Hartman is quick to say . Dr. John Nash who was represented by Russell Crowe in the movie , ” A Beautiful Mind” was a nobel prize winner for his mathematical genius useful in economics. Dr. Stephan Hawking is a renown theoretical physicist. There is no comparison but it suffices to say that all are disabled . Whereas she has been ridiculed and called “crazy” because her disability includes nervous disorders with other conditions, has been lied about and her character defamed to discredit her allegations – the above referenced intellectuals are of course of a different race and she says that makes all the difference in the world . They are revered and respected for their contributions – their handicaps not withstanding.

Ms. Hartman does not have a doctorate degree but says that she was offered opportunities to pursue both a Doctorate degree as well as to pursue medicine but health problems interfered with severe onset around age 24 . She does not claim to be a genius but she does not deserve to be robbed of her intellectual property and not compensated a dime for it and have her character defamed including the illegal seizure of her house for daring to stand up for her property rights ! Others are profiting from her work and her contributions while she is being judged by the color of her skin and the status of her health . She was instrumental in Internet development and deserves compensation for her achievements.

She argues that she is not “chopped liver” either as she had completed a Bachelor’s Degree in Education majoring in Biology and Physical Science from Pennsylvania State University and a Master of Science Education majoring in Chemistry and Biology from the University of Pennsylvania . Her transcript below :penn-transcript2 Further her inventions help billions of people although she has not been given any credit . Her work set up by fraud in the patent office to be taken over by corporations and the running over of her rights as a Pro Se litigant as she has literally been prevented from hiring attorneys because of smear and defamation campaigns designed to discredit her . Her contributions and inventions help billions of people Other inventions by Hartman Internet development was stymied until she introduced her writings about how to use cyberspace which is latent in computers as an alternative marketplace enabling customers and businesses to interact directly with each other .

It has been 26 years since this woman invented the creative ideas that have forever changed the function and character of the Internet– making it possible for it to even extend beyond the boundaries of earth– she is still being disregarded by a government that took the ideas and ran with them without compensating her. “The rules changed when I became involved”, says Inventor.” It generally takes 2-4 years for patent application prosecution I asked to expedite my application when I first filed in 2004– although it was not docketed until 2005. My money was refunded rather than allow me to expedite the application “.Click on images to enlarge them .blog-image-1-request-to-expediteblog-image-2-money-refunded

Dorothy M. Hartman alleges that she is as much a part of Internet History as all the other so called founders as she says that’ there would be no internet had it not been for the National Science Foundation ordering the “Commercialization of Telecommunications in 1990. Merit Networks along with IBM was commissioned for this project by the NSF which had been in charge of the NSFNET which really was a holding place for the retired Internet (the one based on having the ARPANET as its core ). Today’s Internet which is different from the previous Internet which had been discontinued but was transformed by the new ideas and the NSF commission to Merit Networks in 1990. Her contributions made Internet Development different enabling a singular integrative system .

She claims that the success with the Internet which began with the transformation to privitization literally began with ideas that she submitted to the federal government starting in 1989 when she visited the Small Business Administration location at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Between this blog and its sister blog at Telecomstraighttalk.com, you can learn more about this side of Internet internet development. It is not just Race and the criminal justice system but the civil justice system is a challenge for African- Americans as well especially relating to social , cultural , and intellectual property rights .

Hartman alleges that she was met with resistance from the beginning and as is mostly the case when African-Americans become involved especially in projects which may become well known or successful financially and ‘elitists’ or those who consider themselves ‘superior’ are in competition– the rules are changed.” I was told my patent application would take 12 years their letter to me dated 6/6/6.” See below.blog-image-lttr-12-years

The change- although her proposals form a paper trail of correspondence between her and federal and state employees reviewing her proposal on Accessing Accessibility which is a business process which marries technology and commerce to business– was received and ideas copied– she essentially has been ignored since. Only after 1999 and the passing of the American Inventor’s Act did business ideas become patentable. The growth of the Internet really began to take off around 2004 as more users and internet service providers increased.2004 increase in internet users 2004-increase-in-internet-users

However because it became a huge success just as she wrote that it would and changed commerce and the way the world does business forever– as success grew and the government funded corporations and other internet protocol companies that were already involved in the field– GREED, RACISM, and OPPRESSION proliferated right along with the Internet. The supposed movement for “Free and open Internet” was nothing more than a smokescreen for companies which have become rich because of the changes in the Internet behind the scenes lobbying against the patent application which was decided 2012-2013. There are billions and trillions of dollars in the industry and in some ways the economy has been run into the ground. Ms. Hartman who is more responsible for the ideas that made today’s internet a success than any other party has been completely ignored since her ideas were read in the 1990’s. She is still seeking Justice as an African-American inventor as she feels that the theft of her intellectual property and legacy is blasphemous as using anyone’s property and trading on that without injuring the person and compensating for that injury is both ethnically and morally wrong. The abuse of power by authorities using systemic racism to abuse the constitutional and civil of African-Americans is fundamentally wrong. “Justice for African-Americans is long overdue.” Injustice involves more than the criminal justice system

Those in Ecommerce and Technology which have now become hugely successful fields did not even understand how today’s Internet which was first dubbed the’ Information Superhighway’ worked. It is only since I started blogging about it around 2011 that those in the industry began to understand how the Internet worked . Even those who built the phones and computers , code , etc. did not invent the concepts of the Internet only used them with proficiency to sell their wares to millions then billions of people , enriching themselves . When I realized that the federal government was just going to settle for the Supervisory Taking of my intellectual property (which is a violation under the 14th and 5th amendment) in that they have snatched the property to use for population without declaring Eminent Domain or compensating me , the inventor in anyway I filed for a patent protect my legal rights ).Below is a partial list of state and federal employees associated with SBIR ( Small Business Innovation Research) and other plans associated with funding small businesses who reviewed her proposals – the National Science Foundation being the ultimate recipient of these innovations and funding requests .blog-images-3-fed-employees-that-reveiwed-proposals

This is wrong and a violation of the Inventor’s civil and constitutional rights. Additionally a local federal judge and the Court(s) have further persecuted her by the illegal seizure of her home– caused by a fraudulent mortgage foreclosure that was allowed to be carried out in the wrong court of jurisdiction.Inventor’s Home Vandalized and Illegally Seized While intellectual contributors or other inventors to inventions or discoveries that have advanced the population– this inventor has been smeared in defamation campaigns and continuously subjected to violations in Due Process. She has filed the matter regarding her illegally confiscated home in the Supreme Court– still hoping for some kind of relief from misapplication of racism, oppression, and law. Cultural and intellectual property rights involve more than just the elites .

Dorothy M. Hartman alleges that she is as much a part of Internet History as all the other so called founders as she says that’ there would be no internet had it not been for the National Science Foundation ordering the “Commercialization of Telecommunications in 1990. Today’s Internet which is different from the previous Internet which had been discontinued but was transformed by the new ideas and the NSF commission to Merit Networks in 1990.

Because it became a huge success just as she wrote that it would and changed commerce and the way the world does business forever– as success grew and the government funded corporations and other internet protocol companies that were already involved in the field– GREED, RACISM, and OPPRESSION proliferated right along with the Internet. The supposed movement for “Free and open Internet” was nothing more than a smokescreen for companies which have become rich because of the changes in the Internet behind the scenes lobbying against the patent application which was decided 2012-2013. The general population deserves to know the full information about internet development and the history of the Internet .

Internet , Plagiarized Invention of the 20th Century

African-American inventor , Dorothy M. Hartman says that the “Internet” is the biggest plagiarized idea of the 20th Century

Black female inventor says that the Federal Government plagiarized the “Internet” who some regard as the greatest invention of the 20th Century .

Today’s Internet is not the Internet of yesteryear based on the Arpanet .

A few weeks ago there was a dust up about Trump’s wife alleged plagiarizing of Michele Obama’s speech . There was some discussion of plagiarism especially in the black community as so much has been plagiarized from blacks from soul rhythm and blues to buffalo chicken wings . However it does not stop there , plagiarizing has been around for awhile and those that can get away with it . However , what about plagiarizing whole inventions even great ones ?The following are excerpts of pages taken directly from Dorothy Hartman’s proposals submitted to the federal government in 1990 through its Small Business innovation Research or SBIR programs . New ideas are routinely reviewed by federal government employees but ultimately evaluated by the National Science Foundation when determining the awarding or distribution of funding . Hartman alleges that her ideas as illustrated in these pages of her proposals were plagiarized by the National Science Foundation as it literally stole her ideas to revitalize the NSFNET ( which was a holding placed for the old Internet based on the Arpanet and that had been retired in 1989 ).

She alleges that adapting the retired telecom network for COMMERCIALIZATION based on Hartman’s writings is what produced what was first called the ‘INFORMATION SUPERHIGHWAY’ and later the ‘INTERNET’. Unlike the prior internet structure which was called the “internetting projects ” because they consisted of a series of mini nets : instinet , bitnet , telenet , and so on – today’s Internet is a seamlessly integrated structure.
These pages taken from Hartman’s proposals to the Benjamin Franklin Technology Center , Pennsylvania Department of Commerce , and the U.S. Small Business Administration represent the core ideas that Hartman alleges were used by the NSF to transform telecom and so changed the world . The federal government continues to suppress her identify and to violate her intellectual property rights . She continues to be unrecognized and uncompensated for her critical contributions 1) Commercialization of telecom and 2) The use of Cyberspace for transactions that changed the face of telecommunications. These concepts revolutionized the telecom industry and are the cornerstones of the modern day Internet . The 4 Hartman documents ( click to enlarge the document) below introduced in 1990 are what put today’s INTERNET in motion and built the trillion dollar Ecommerce and Technology industries . Some redaction was done for privacy :08-15-2016 06;15;31AM08-15-2016 06;23;14AM
08-15-2016 06;35;33AM08-15-2016 06;44;06AM

Hartman alleges that the National Science Foundation plagiarized her ideas to bring the retired telecom structure parked as the NSFNET back to life . With ordinary consumers and businesses engaging on the Internet for the first time and growth began for the industry from there . “And still the monsters have not done right by me , says Hartman. I am owed an award , a prize , honorable mention or something as long as a big fat check accompanies it . Being ignored while my intellectual property rights were simply taken over with no recognition is simply wrong . Her ideas are the reasons why the Internet exists today ” .

This was the invention of Internet 2 , not a telephone or computer , but a business idea .
This was the invention of Internet 2 , not a telephone or computer , but a business idea .
Graph shows that as the movement of data packets increased with more users , more Internet Providers were needed
Graph shows that as the movement of data packets increased with more users , more Internet Providers were needed

Presidential Candidates Debate Racism in U.S.

Team Member and Race

Computer 003

Even as the ‘corporate approved candidates’ begin to vie and debate for the presidential election in November 2016 , racism practiced against the black American woman who really put technology into motion

Hillary Clinton , the first Woman to be nominated for President of the U.S. as well as Elizabeth Warren a very active Democrat who may be considered as a possible Vice- President debate Donald Trump about Race

A black woman inventor alleges that her claims regarding the invention of Internet 2 have made her a victim of intense racism and discrimination

.

See Inventor’s testimony before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Judges in 2012 here 11003123-11

Dorothy Hartman , a retired Science Teacher , inventor , and founder of ABFY Sellers Group Inc says that her life has been turned into an oppression ‘hell’ . Not only was her patent application for the Accessing Accessibility Method when reduced to practice comprises what is today’s Internet ( invented in 1990 when Hartman’s ideas were applied to the prior telecom network(s) founded by ARPA and pioneered by Vinton and Cerf) – but Hartman alleges that the prior Internet based on the Arpanet was retired in 1989 and parked as the NSFnet . The NSFnet was converted in 1990 into a telecom network that was adapted for commerce . Hartman alleges that the National Science Foundation used her ideas to adapt telecom for Commercialization. Here is a copy of the Accessing Accessibility Abstract found here
AccessingAccessibility Abstract.ApplicationNo.11003123 Although her ideas were thoroughly reviewed by numerous government employees working within the Small Business Innovation Research ( SBIR) Program the National Science Foundation gave credit for her invention to those that had been involved in the Internetting Projects from 1969 through 1989 . Hartman alleges that Internet 2 which debuted around 1993 after Merit Networks and IBM had made changes to NSFnet using Hartman’s model of COMMERCIALIZING TELECOMMUNICATIONS which from its initial installment has revolutionized telecommunications and the way the world does business and is the only Internet known and used by the public . The Internet 2 after Commercialization was added and was first nicknamed by Al Gore as the Information Superhighway became a huge success and is continuing to expand today . While the presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump argue about Racism , Hartman says that she is living it and its toxic and destructive effects and influence .

Although Hartman’s contributions were the most cerebral using creative and intuitive thought to suggest the use of cyberspace as an alternative marketplace – they were the most significant as the Internet would not exist without them . Many within the technology field itself still do not understand how the Internet works . A patent application should never have been necessary. The government knows that she was the originator of these ideas . However patented or not the intellectual property is hers . Yet she has been left out and more than that retaliated against with discriminatory treatment because of speaking out about it. Although her inventions contribute trillions of dollars into the economy as other inventions have been stolen through fraud in the USPTO – she is never compensated but robbed of her property both real and intellectual. The Internet even enables internet innovations by others – she is being left without credit or compensation – essentially treated like a slave .Hartman not only was denied her patent application for the Internet – she says based on pure racism and oppression after the government realized the wealth potential of the new Internet but also claims that her home purchased with 30 years of science teaching is being fraudulently foreclosed upon by local bigots and frauds in Philadelphia acting upon the injustice being handed down by the Barack Obama administration .

The Obama administration , Hartman alleges sacrificed her civil and constitutional rights regarding her intellectual property to the lobbying of huge Internet Corporations that have grown rich and powerful because of the new Internet based on Hartman’s model that enables the use of Cyberspace . Hartman alleges the tech geniuses who were selling computers , inventing mobile phones and writing codes out of their garages and apartments became vastly rich after the Accessing Accessibility method was adopted leading to the sales of their products to billions of customers . The billions of customers and the expansiveness of the Internet is the results of Hartman’s creativity and what enabled ecommerce and technology to become rich . The thanks to her as a result of institutionalized racism and oppression due to the wealth of the Internet has thus far been slander , libel , fraud and court cases resulting in unfair and unjust court rulings . She is hoping to reach out to the present administration through legal representation to request that the immense injustice done to her be undone .