LAWYERS NEEDED , SEE INVENTOR'S REFLECTIONS

Telecomstraighttalk

TelecomstraighttalkTelecomstraighttalkTelecomstraighttalk

Telecomstraighttalk

TelecomstraighttalkTelecomstraighttalkTelecomstraighttalk
  • Home
  • Government Corruption
  • Inventor at Univ. of Penn
  • Inventor at UPENN 2
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Inventor Reflections
  • INTRODUCING INTERNET 2
  • Race Riots or Massacres
  • Other Hartman Inventions
  • Patent Application
  • The Patent and Law
  • Press Releases
  • More
    • Home
    • Government Corruption
    • Inventor at Univ. of Penn
    • Inventor at UPENN 2
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Inventor Reflections
    • INTRODUCING INTERNET 2
    • Race Riots or Massacres
    • Other Hartman Inventions
    • Patent Application
    • The Patent and Law
    • Press Releases
  • Home
  • Government Corruption
  • Inventor at Univ. of Penn
  • Inventor at UPENN 2
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Inventor Reflections
  • INTRODUCING INTERNET 2
  • Race Riots or Massacres
  • Other Hartman Inventions
  • Patent Application
  • The Patent and Law
  • Press Releases

Patent application #11003123

Was it prosecuted lawfully ?

The case In Re Dorothy M. Hartman referencing the Patent Office was decided by FRAUD and was incorrectly decided . The wrong set of claims were used to decide the case . Here you will find the claims that were used to decide the case but remember they were unedited . Hartman was forced to rewrite claims according to 2011 law although she had filed in 2004 . The rewritten claims are found here on the website but were deliberately not used in the Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit to insure denial of the Patent as Hartman alleges .

Concepts were introduced to SBIR in 1990

Hartman filed concepts from the Accessibility Process and Submitted concepts in 1990 to federal government's Research and Innovation Program SBIR .Patent Application filed Dec. 3 2004 after government had taken possession of the process and used it to replace its failed Arpanet and now refuses to recognize or compensate her .

Find out more

Fed. Gov . had control of Accessing Accessibility from 1990- pres.

Hartman alleges that the U.S. Federal Government has had control of her intellectual property from 1990 until now claiming the Internet 2 as its own . Wny was her patent application denied ?

See Here

Who are the supposed inventor(s) who barred the patent ?

Is the  Circuit Ct. of Appeals , Case No. 2013-1070 Opinion of "Indefiniteness" a true reason to deny patenting or the government's illegal seizure of inventor's intellectual property ? The inventor has been subjected to defamation , illegal confiscation of her home , bodily harm , blackballing in legal databases to frighten of lawyers , now censuring from her own invention 

Hartman alleges a 30 year violation of her constitutional and civil rights as well as allegations of slavery and deprivation of her property rights, intimidation and threats , censure , illegal trials , and other forms of persecution .

Government presents Tim Berners Lee and others as Inventors of the Internet and Worldwide Web

Hartman alleges that it was her invention that brought the modern day internet into existence and others have been important contributor to the cogs that make the Internet run, Mr. Lee is not its inventor but he designed the first website that moves your browser from one website address to another in Cyberspace.

Let's Talk About Whether Patents Should be Awarded by Race

Visit again to learn more....

Copyright © 2023 Telecomstraighttalk - All Rights Reserved.

  • Inventor at Univ. of Penn
  • Patent Application

Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder